Recent content by omega4

Just curious. Thanks.

I agree. I don't see the industry getting any better either. Speaking of which, does this site have an official connection with Firaxis or its developer Take2?

Turn 101 to 108 (820 AD to 960 AD): PHILADELPHIA (USA) England uses 1 siege and 1 infantry division to attack the American city Philadelphia. The Americans send in 3 infantry divisions from the north to help relieve the siege (and destroy 1 half-strength English infantry division in the...

The issue I have is that more devs / publishers of PC gamers are leaving it to modders to fix their games for them (for free). I won't support devs / publishers by purchasing their games at full price when they're taking advantage of modders like that.

A lot of Steam gamers (myself included) check the gamer reviews before buying. The Steam game reviews for Civ6 are mixed and for good reason. Lots of negative reviews are about the AI and bugs throughout the game. Now, I still bought Civ6 because it was at a massive discount (just $12 for...

Well, I am of the opinion that if devs like Firaxis don't think fixing the AI and Civ6 bugs aren't really worth the monetary investment, then my buying the rest of the Civ6 products isn't worth my monetary investment as well. Fortunately, I only wasted $12 on Civ6 and 2 DLCs via HumbleBundle...

The other games devs aren't focused on "catering to the masses" the way Civ games do. If anything, those other games are looking to outdo each other in complexity and micromanagement in some form or another. For me, Civ games have just the right amount of complexity (if you can call it that)...

Speaking for myself, it's lack of interest because of Civ6's bugs. Unit sounds clipping out. An AI that can't build nor use aircraft (a basic unit if there ever was one). But all the rationlization defending Firaxis is amusing. So keep it up. Please do not troll the forums. leif

Or perhaps gamers don't want to waste any more time than necessary on an incomplete, buggy game. One where the AI is incompetent and unit sounds still cut out (almost a year after the game's release date).

Sounds like some gamers (or Firaxis employees?) are willing to let the devs get away with an incompetent AI (and expecting the modder community to do the dev's jobs for them). Glad I'm not one of those gamers. Based on your post, I will no longer buy any more Civ6 products and will simply wait...

I just finished a great All AI Autoplay with Civ5 Vox Populi. I'm documenting the match here if you want to see an example of a great Civ AI in action (the AI builds AND uses aircraft): https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/civ5-vox-populi-amazing-ai.626971/ Frankly, the Civ6 devs should be...

Ch2: Turn 97 to 101 (710 to 820 AD): The Romans mass 1 infantry, 2 cavalry, and 2 siege divisions and direct them west towards the Russian city of Yaroslavl. The Russians can only muster an infantry and cavalry division a piece to counter the Romans. The Roman and Russian cavalry skirmish, with...

I just finished an AI Autoplay and wanted to share how great the AI is (especially in contrast to the incompetent CIV6 AI). Started a CIV5 Vox Populi game with 6 AI. The Western Continent had 2 civs: China and Greece. The Eastern Continent has 4 civs: America, England, Russia, Mayans. I'm...

All I'm looking for is Firaxis to fix the AI so that it builds units as basic as aircraft and uses them. That and fixing the unit sounds clipping in and out. I can't believe neither basic bugs have been fixed yet in Civ6. And please don't bother rationalizing why neither issue has been fixed...

You still failed to address the point as you rationalized the actions of the publisher / developer. Why don't gamers hold developers / publishers to a higher standard?