floydmcw
Prince
Assuming unrestricted leaders what is the worst possible combination of leader and civ? Bonus points if you can find one where they aren't just individually bad but the UU/UB, techs and traits actively work against one another.
There probably aren't that many examples of "UU/UB, techs and traits actively work against one another". The Monument UB civs (Egypt and Ethiopia) are kind of a waste when played by CRE leaders, but Hatshepsut and Zara are CRE and nobody thinks they are bad leaders. There are other antisynergical leaders in the base game -- Alex and Augustus for instance -- and they seem to do just fine. Another way to think of mismatched characteristics is that they give you lots of options; Augustus can kill people with Praets or he can wonder it up.
For the worst unrestricted leaders I'd try to pair bad trait combos with lackluster civs:
Tokugawa, Charlemagne, Genghis Khan, Hammurabi, Churchill (no more Drill IV redcoats)
x
Celts, Holy Rome, Japan, America, Greece, Germany [added]
Maybe the worst would be Tokugawa of Celtia? Bad starting techs, traits with no economic benefit, bad UB, situational UU (it starts with Combat 1, but so do Boudicca's; CHA > PRO).