Melda
Wannabe Psephologist
((Not necessarily inherited. . . Two options :
1) Senator announces that he will be retiring at the next election, the senator's child who is also a member of the party rreceives preselection from the party to run in their parents' place.
2) Senator dies or retires mid-term and the party nominates his child to replace him in the Senate.
The first option happens quite a bit in Australia ; especially if a member has held a seat for a long time they hold personal appeal above and beyond their party affiliations, so you end up with a kind of ppolitical dynasty.
Also we will at some point need to explicitly allow women to run for office. I believe an order passed by the Senate is all that would be required.
This actually brings me to one of the constitutional clarifications I was hoping to discuss in the next Senate: that of casual vacancies. The Honourable Sir Parker's disappearance caused a bit of a constitutional crisis insofar no mechanism exists to replace him.
As we do not use single member electorates it is infeasible to hold a by-election (or special election as it's called in America) because at least four of the seven senators will not have won a plurality. So if the second or third senators in a city are replaced by by-election it results in an unfair situation where a party is almost guaranteed to lose the seat to the most dominant party which is not what would have happened at a general election where multiple seats are filled at once.
My proposal is to adopt the method used to address casual vacancies in the Australian Senate: if a member resigns (or in this scenario the party leader has the seat declared vacant because the player hasn't been seen for a while) the party the Senator belonged to at the time of the last election can appoint the person they want to replace their outgoing member (so for example if I'm elected as PIP at the election and then midterm defect to the PPP and resign or go missing it's the PIP who get to choose my replacement because that's the party I represented when the voters elected me).
Of course if we ever move to single member electorates I would of course support the use of by-elections to resolve those casual vacancies.))
Edit: I have added the Honourable Gurra's first name to my election notes (in signature).
1) Senator announces that he will be retiring at the next election, the senator's child who is also a member of the party rreceives preselection from the party to run in their parents' place.
2) Senator dies or retires mid-term and the party nominates his child to replace him in the Senate.
The first option happens quite a bit in Australia ; especially if a member has held a seat for a long time they hold personal appeal above and beyond their party affiliations, so you end up with a kind of ppolitical dynasty.
Also we will at some point need to explicitly allow women to run for office. I believe an order passed by the Senate is all that would be required.

This actually brings me to one of the constitutional clarifications I was hoping to discuss in the next Senate: that of casual vacancies. The Honourable Sir Parker's disappearance caused a bit of a constitutional crisis insofar no mechanism exists to replace him.
As we do not use single member electorates it is infeasible to hold a by-election (or special election as it's called in America) because at least four of the seven senators will not have won a plurality. So if the second or third senators in a city are replaced by by-election it results in an unfair situation where a party is almost guaranteed to lose the seat to the most dominant party which is not what would have happened at a general election where multiple seats are filled at once.
My proposal is to adopt the method used to address casual vacancies in the Australian Senate: if a member resigns (or in this scenario the party leader has the seat declared vacant because the player hasn't been seen for a while) the party the Senator belonged to at the time of the last election can appoint the person they want to replace their outgoing member (so for example if I'm elected as PIP at the election and then midterm defect to the PPP and resign or go missing it's the PIP who get to choose my replacement because that's the party I represented when the voters elected me).
Of course if we ever move to single member electorates I would of course support the use of by-elections to resolve those casual vacancies.))
Edit: I have added the Honourable Gurra's first name to my election notes (in signature).