I made the arduous journey out to Coventry for the final days of the campaign. What had initially seemed to be quiet, sleepy town electorally had suddenly turned into the most contested city in the nation.
Mister Henry Absoluti was seeking to hold the seat that his late father held, and the former Senator Albert Bazil had given up his safe Pulias City seat to try and turn Coventry into a Pulian Imperial Party stronghold. With the Pulias People's Party candidate, Percy Huggins it seemed as though Coventry was crowded enough already before the arrival of the independent candidate David Richterson, who I had the opportunity to interview.
The latest opinion polling seemed to indicated he had blitzed to the front of the candidates running in Coventry, and I was interested to shine some light on the mystery of the candidate about whom we didn't previously know too much about.
As for the candidate himself, David Richterson was the very image of a working-class man: he wore a dirty leather apron with many stains, he had short and greasy hair and he was stood motionless in his front lawn, holding his mallet, which seemed to have become presumably by accident a signature trademark of his personal brand. I thought we would go into the house. We did not. We awkwardly stood in the yard and conducted the interview. I could not sit down. I did not have a table. I had to try and make notes as I stood. It was quite a bizarre experience.
H. Godwin: Thank you for agreeing to meet me on such short notice.
D. Richterson: It was not a problem. I work in my personal workshops; there are no deadlines.
H.G.: What made you decide to run for public office?
D.R.: Issues exist. They need to be fixed. My solutions are efficient. Other peoples' solutions should not be used. I will replace them.
H.G.: Are you concerned that you're running against the leader of the Pulian Imperial Party, Henry Absoluti, and Albert Bazil, arguably a political veteran with one term already under his belt as a Senator?
D.R.: Yes. This is probably my biggest challenge.
H.G.: How do you intend to overcome this challenge?
D.R.: Speaking to people about my solutions. Not that that is something they will not do, just that this is my approach as well.
H.G.: Recent opinion polling shows you potentially defeating the former Senator Albert Bazil. What are your thoughts on this matter?
D.R.: This is only to be expected. I am the better candidate.
H.G.: I understand the National Railway Project is quite popular here in Coventry, due to its isolated positioning. As an industrialist, what is your view of this project, especially with consideration to the current national deficit?
D.R.: Pulias leads the world in manufacturing of goods. We must take advantage of and strengthen this lead. The railway will help.
H.G.: What is your view on the recent influx of Luddite refugees?
D.R.: Cheap labor is never without use.
H.G.: What do you say to the view that we are responsible for these refugees, since we destroyed their home?
D.R.: We are not responsible because we destroyed their home. We are responsible because they live in our country.
H.G.: Some people say that Luddite sympathisers are traitors. What is your view on the subject?
D.R.: I don't understand how one can sympathise with them. They are people. How can you sympathise with one person over another because of groups they
previously belonged to? It makes no sense.
H.G.: I see. If you are successful in your current bid for election to the Senate, you will be but one vote in the seven seat chamber. Which parties would you see yourself most likely to work with?
D.R.: The PAU views are the most collaborative.
H.G.: In what way?
D.R.: Overall, I agree with them the most. Their military policies most match mine, but not completely, in social policies they mirror me, but in technology our opinions differ.
H.G.: Who would you like to see as Prime Minister?
D.R.: Miss Megame.
H.G.: Why do you say that?
D.R.: She seems to be capable, both as a leader and in making sensible change. If one person is a leader, even democratically, for their entire life, how are they distinguishable from a monarch?
H.G.: An interesting point of view. Where do your social views sit, politically?
D.R.: I see my views as a sort of collaboration between Miss Megame's and the general theme of the PAU.
H.G.: That's very interesting. You find the PAU most agreeable, but you prefer Miss Megame? It is true that most commentators consider Miss Megame's views to be essentially a more populist face for PAU policies. Do you agree?
D.R.: A more populist face is what the PAU needs. They are too distant from their supporters, while Miss Megame has created what will be a very effective strategy. I support the actions of one and the ideas of the other.
H.G.: This election has seen the running of two female candidates, the first entrants of their sex in what has been up until now a male-dominated sphere. What are your views on this?
D.R.: As I answered in the Luddite questions: They are politicians. Male or female. Why does this matter?
H.G.: I see. I guess I had best let you get back to your . . . whatever you were doing.
D.R.: Thank you for taking the time to visit me. I will go back to my forge now.
That was truly the most bizarre interview I've ever had. Actually, no, it was only the second most bizarre interview
that I can recall.
But, there you have it: that was Mister Richterson, presently the front-running candidate in Coventry, ahead of even Mister Absoluti of the Pulian Imperial Party. Make of that what you will.
Perhaps instead of the anticipated return of the PAU/PPP coalition there could foreseeably be a coalition formed by the PAU and two independent Senators, headed by the Prime Minister, Sofia Megame? We will see. Interesting times, dear readers, interesting times.