UK to Block Internet Pornography

Zelig

Beep Boop
Joined
Jul 8, 2002
Messages
17,419
Location
Canada
http://www.news.com.au/breaking-new...-government-plan/story-e6frfkui-1225973481287

Spoiler :
THE UK Government is to combat the early sexualization of children by blocking internet pornography unless parents request it, it was revealed today.

The move is intended to ensure that children are not exposed to sex as a routine by-product of the internet. It follows warnings about the hidden damage being done to children by sex sites.

The biggest broadband providers, including BT, Virgin Media and TalkTalk, are being called to a meeting next month by Ed Vaizey, the communications minister, and will be asked to change how pornography gets into homes.

Instead of using parental controls to stop access to pornography - so-called "opting out" - the tap will be turned off at source. Adults will then have to "opt in."

The new initiative is in advance of the imminent convergence of the internet and television on one large screen in the living room.

It follows the success of an operation by most British internet service providers (ISPs) to prevent people inadvertently viewing child porn websites. Ministers want companies to use similar technology to shut out adult pornography from children. Pornography sites will be blocked at source unless people specifically ask to view them.

TalkTalk, which includes Tiscali and the British version of Aol.com, is already introducing a new free service early next year called "bright feed," which allows people to control the internet so that all devices are automatically covered without the need to set up individual controls.

Homeowners can either specify which adult sites they want to receive or put a cinema-style classification on their feed to restrict what is received according to age ranges, such as U, 12 or 18. A survey by Psychologies magazine this summer found that one in three children aged 10 in Britain had viewed pornography on the net.

Mr Vaizey said: "This is a very serious matter. I think it is very important that it's the ISPs that come up with solutions to protect children.

"I'm hoping they will get their acts together so we don't have to legislate, but we are keeping an eye on the situation and we will have a new communications bill in the next couple of years."

Claire Perry, the Tory MP for Devizes and a keen lobbyist for more restrictions, said: "Unless we show leadership, the internet industry is not going to self-regulate. The minister has said he will get the ISPs together and say, 'Either you clean out your stables or we are going to do it for you'."

"There is this very uneasy sense for parents of children that we do not have to tolerate this Wild West approach. We are not coming at this from an anti-porn perspective. We just want to make sure our children aren't stumbling across things we don't want them to see."

Previously the Internet Services Providers' Association (ISPA) has told MPs that such a blanket ban would be expensive and technically difficult to operate.

But Miranda Suit, co-founder of the charity Safermedia, which held a conference on internet porn at the Commons last month, said: "Technically we know it can be done because the ISPs are already removing child porn after the government put pressure on them.

"In the past, internet porn was regarded as a moral issue or a matter of taste. Now it has become a mental health issue because we now know the damage it is causing. We are seeing perverse sexual behavior among children. Legislation is both justifiable and feasible."

She quoted the example of two underage brothers sentenced to at least five years' detention this year for a sadistic sex attack on two other boys in South Yorkshire. The brothers were said to have had a "toxic" home life where they were exposed to pornography.

This weekend some ISPs appeared ready to introduce an "opt in" clause voluntarily. Andrew Heaney, executive director of strategy and regulation for TalkTalk, said: "Our objective was not to do what the politicians want us to do but to do what was right by our customers.

"If other companies aren't going to do it of their own volition, then maybe they should be leant on. Legislation is a sledgehammer but it could work."

A spokeswoman for Virgin Media said: "We already have an opt-in approach on mobiles. We've taken this approach as mobiles are taken out of the home - and kept in a pocket - whereas parents can control what happens within the home and online "We're able to block sites, so it would be possible to do the same on the internet. It is just about finding the right approach."

A spokesman for BT, which has a "clean feed" system to block access to illegal sites, said: "We do what we can to protect children."

The ISPA did not return calls to London's Sunday Times.

Do you support internet pornography being opt-in at the ISP level?

Will these measures protect children from pornography?

How will these measures affect pornography consumption by adults?

Do you support any internet censorship?

How much of slippery slope is this?

How far is the UK extending its "big brother" approach? How far is too far?

What do you think are the motives behind this block on porn?

Were you mentally damaged by adult pornography as a child?
 
Any Internet censorship is fundamentally unacceptable. There's simply no way to draw a line in regards to content on the Internet, and once you start censoring it period, it's a slippery slope to censoring it completely.
 
wow

This is not going to help its repute as a fascist state in the making, you know?
 
Naturally, they do this before I potentially go there.
 
Damn them, damn them all to hell.

That being said, a virus on my old computer did mean that my homepage was a porn site for a while. That was in primary school. I don't think it affected me too adversely.
 
So if a kid accidentally sees body parts they're ruined for life?
 
I realize parental controls aren't always perfect, but this is excessively overboard IMO.

And is children seeing porn such a huge issue that this action needs to be taken?
 
The example provided for porn's harmful effects doesn't really make sense. How were they inspired to sadistically attack other kids by seeing internet porn?
 
wow

This is not going to help its repute as a fascist state in the making, you know?

The morality of the masses is very far separated from the morality of the individual. You can't expect a government or any body similar to a government to mandate something like this; responsibility has to be taken on the parental level, because kids will find a way to get their hands on pornography if they are so determined, filter or no filter.

This is a concept that a lot of this type of legislation, particularly over in Ol' Blighty, fails to grasp.
 
Will they also be blocking the Tories' website so young children won't be exposed to cruelty and greed?
 
Where is the proof that there is any harm done by seeing porn?
There is porn and then there is porn. Rape sites probably aren´t going to surprise anyone, but I´ve stumbled on pictures of women attempting to... stuff graters into their cavities.

That probably isn't going to help anyone achieve a healthy understanding of sex. Not to say I´d hate having to explain it to my son. Primarily because I am having trouble getting it myself. :ack:

EDIT: Doesn't mean I support the proposed measure, but there have been days I almost would.
 
If I get a Humon comic about it, I'll support it.
 
Any Internet censorship is fundamentally unacceptable. There's simply no way to draw a line in regards to content on the Internet, and once you start censoring it period, it's a slippery slope to censoring it completely.
Child porn is already illegal in the us so I guess it's too late anyway. . .
 
Trust to Tories do to this eh? Typical conservatives always trying to interfere in people's bedrooms and personal lives.
 
Yes when Tori Spelling and Tori Amos get together they always ruin everything.

Was that a bad joke?
 
Ok, I didn't read the whole article, because I'm lazy, but what's the problem? No adult is denied pornography, it's just set off as a default. At least I see no problem with that, at least if the adult can with relative ease turn it on.

Most of modern porn isn't just people having sex, it contains more or less sadistic practices, which I don't think are healthy for children to see. I won't go into detail here, but if someone claims it ain't so, he needs to watch more porn (or less).

I'm all for porn, and I wouldn't mind if teens/preteens would see (of their own free will) films of people having sex. Most of the net porn just isn't that.
 
But can you imagine having to call the ISP to turn it on. Maybe some people are shy about that.
 
Back
Top Bottom