Did ANYONE check the
LINK I provided???
I wonder, how else did Muslims rise to 10-20% percent of some EUROPEAN cities population if not through immigration combined with LESS children for Europeans???
And less children is achieved through less NATURAL marriages combined with less children in a CAREER-bound family.
OK, here's the math:
(The numbers sometimes get a BIT altered for easier counting.)
Consider a city is always 100 citizens.
So, it starts as:
100% native; 0% immigrant.
Next generation chooses to have only 1 child in every second family.
Thus, the next generation ends up as 25*2+25*1=75 native children.
The rest 25 can easily come from immigration.
Now, the Muslims, say, have 3 children in every second family, while natives have 1 and 2 again.
Then (we say, 38 native N families and 12 immigrant M):
19*2+19*1+12*3=57N+36M=93
7 more immigrants.
Then (28fN + 22fM):
14*(2+1)+22*3=42N+66M=108
8 get expelled to end up as 100.
Then (20fN+30fM):
10*(2+1)+30*3=30N+90M=120
Now you have to expel already 20!
Then (14fN+36fM):
7*3+36*3=21N+108M!!!!!
The total number of immigrants is MORE than the number of original residents!!!
And that's with all the expulsions!!!
OK, this is too mathematized, but you should get the IDEA.
Also, both 1-per-every-second-family for natives and 3-per-family for immigrants are random numbers.
But actually, the first can be LOWER and the second HIGHER..!!!
So it's even WORSE!!!
EDIT:
I was writing it for some long time - so I won't discard such a huge effort.
But we can stop discussing it NOW.