knupp715
King
IMHO CCC does the best job of awarding the "Champions of Civilization." We don't only have epics... We have a cton, 1v1, an epic, and all different era teamers. I don't think someone can be the champion of Civ because they are decent at epics. Maybe throw in some new types of games that appeal to all players. Your tournament should be renamed "MP Challenge: cIV Epic Champion League" if you leave it like it is.
I recognized a few names when I searched through the players in the tourney. I know a few of them might be great in some type of games but on other types they could be easily slaughtered.
I'm not saying that what you play sucks. It's true 8 hour games don't really appeal to me..I don't have the time or patience, and that's only if I didn't die from boredome. Nor am I saying that the games played on c4p are better than yours. I'm saying you should really change your name. It's the main reason you are recieving so much negative attention.
The real champions of civs are those that can play all different types of games, some they might not be great at, and some they might be the best at. And if they come out on top then they deserve the title of a champion.
I recognized a few names when I searched through the players in the tourney. I know a few of them might be great in some type of games but on other types they could be easily slaughtered.
I'm not saying that what you play sucks. It's true 8 hour games don't really appeal to me..I don't have the time or patience, and that's only if I didn't die from boredome. Nor am I saying that the games played on c4p are better than yours. I'm saying you should really change your name. It's the main reason you are recieving so much negative attention.
The real champions of civs are those that can play all different types of games, some they might not be great at, and some they might be the best at. And if they come out on top then they deserve the title of a champion.