JohannaK
Heroically Clueless
Han China here.
The Danube could prove to be complicated, since Romanian-Hungarian relations are "bad".
If the US send their own tankers to import Oil from Romania, feel free to do that.
We will Export 1 million tonnes of oil and petroleum products this years and I'm sure that the Great will be able to divide them between each other.
As long as there is no conflicts, our tankers won't need any protection, thats true.
We don't want to favour any factions, anybody is free to buy its share from our exports.
The US applauds the Romananian Governments stance as a responsible and prudent move to maintain her neutrality and facilitate free and godly trade.
Immaculate said:The National Unity Coalition the Black-North conservative-fascist coalition
Like fascists everywhere, the NUC are more about theater than they are ideology or political action. They march around shouting about the “weakness that has infected our once great kingdom” denouncing vice, criminality, ‘un-British’ behavior and values, and the fall of social hierarchy and the associated order. They angrily shout a lot of slogans and practice outstretched arm salutes and do their best to intimidate those that don’t agree with poorly defined ideologies.
But they have to stand for something right… even ‘big tent’ fascism must have some sort of ideology? This is an attempt to define some of the NUC values.
National Identity and Values
The National Unity Coalition believes in the superiority of the Anglo and especially Anglo-Victorian cultural identity. They argue that the failures of recent governments and the British people in the last generation is due, in large part, because we abandoned the proven British values of stoicism and strength, social and personal restraint, strict social code of conduct, defined hierarchical relationships, and the rule of law and order.
While the NUC embraces traditional social and cultural values, like the Victorians they seek to emulate, they also embrace progressivism, adopting Taylorism and encouraging the appointment of technocrats within government and progressive leaders in industry. Black has stated, "we have to face modern problems with modern minds, we should then be able to lift this great economic problem and national emergency far above the turmoil of party clamour and with national unity could achieve a solution adequate to the problem and worthy of the modern mind.” Wordy- but the point is made; in economic affairs especially they are progressivists; un-ironically this is also in keeping with reactionary Victorian ideals where modernists policies dominated economic thinking.
At the base of what the NUC are, you’ll find a mixture of traditional, “Anglo-Victorian” values and “modern”, progressivist, organization. Of course, because its fascism and its structure so clearly proto-military, it inherently values militarism and the ‘strength of arms’.
But mostly its about theater and shouting and marching around and “change for the better”.
Traditionalism and the Monarchy
As articulated by the Black-North coalition, the strength of the British people and its superior culture lies in its sense of order and hierarchy and at the top of that hierarchy necessarily lies the British crown. And so the NUC are strong supporters of the Queen. The oft-repeated pledge of the Black and Tan includes "absolute loyalty to the Crown" with the aim to "in every way maintain its dignity".
As part of the ‘return to greatness and the purging of the cancer of weakness that has infected our great kingdom’ the NUC has advocated for a reversal of the liberal’s 20-year old Parliament Act. This reversal would strengthen the appointed executive, and in particular, the crown, and ‘return dignity and strength to our once great institutions’.
At the same time, the NUC seeks to strengthen the executive of the Prime Minister’s and reduce the factionalism and disunity of the House of Commons. These new ‘executive powers’ are meant to curtail the ‘steady erosion’ of the dignity of British values by the incessant squabbling and arguments of this House.
And while liberals and republicans might bemoan the perceived attack upon democracy in the kingdom, the Black and Tan’s polish their cudgels and decry the ‘Un-Britishness’ of an increasingly intimidated, and silenced, opposition. For the majority population, the theater and charisma of the fascist movement and their calls for the ‘return of British greatness’ easily drown out the intellectual, and often dryly academic, voices of the liberal republicans.
Race, Culture, and Colonialism
The theater of fascism necessarily requires an ‘us’ and a ‘them’, a pure ‘national’ identity to emulate and an ‘alien other’ to avoid and scapegoat. In some cases this can be based on racial appearance- white and brown or what-have you, but the NUC did things differently.
For the NUC culture creates national and racial differences- not genetics. Any people who emulate and embrace the Anglo-Victorian ideal and values will necessarily succeed, the superiority of their adopted values uplifting them with its principles of restraint, order, hierarchy, and quiet pride.
It is for this reason, the NUC points to the Imperial Dominion of India not as an example of the dirty ‘other race’, but as a celebrated success story, an example of the uplifting influence of the Anglo-Victorian culture upon a people who would otherwise squander potential and opportunity. The traditional ‘Jewel of India’ remains a shining gemstone to the NUC, proof of the success British culture can bring throughout the colonies.
Totalitarianism
Black and North have not shied from “totalitarianism”. The term "totalitarian" had initially been used as a pejorative accusation by Britain’s liberal opposition, that denounced the fascist movement for seeking to create a total dictatorship. However the NUC responded by accepting that they were totalitarian, presenting totalitarianism from a positive viewpoint. Black describes totalitarianism as seeking to forge an authoritarian national state that would be capable of realizing the return of British greatness, to forge a powerful and modern Britain, and to create a new kind of citizen – the neo-Victorian, politically conscious, militarily-invested- Britain.
Economics
British fascism, based in part on the successes of Turkey, promotes a corporatist economic system whereby employer and employee syndicates are linked together in associations to collectively represent the nation's economic producers and work alongside the state to set national economic policy. This economic system intended to resolve class conflict through collaboration between the classes.
Importantly, the NUC is not anti-worker or anti-labor. The British economy cannot serve the capitalist; it must serve the state and the crown. At the same time, it cannot serve the worker or its unions. Both capital and labor must unite to serve the nation.
The NUC critique of communism lies not with its strengthening of the laborer or its unions, but primarily with its anti-national, revolutionary (Ie- government toppling), rhetoric.
Religion
Black places the blame for the reprisals between Catholics and Protestants in Ireland upon the ‘factionalist’ policies of the former liberal governments. He advocates complete religious toleration, insisting that British of all faiths must serve Britain. The ‘Irish issue’ as seen by the few thoughtful NUC is one of ‘misplaced nationalism’ and ‘treason’, not religion. For most though it’s about shouting and marching around and smashing some heads.
The pronounced ideology has proven popular amongst British Catholics who see in the NUC a door into British politics, even if it is only to exploit membership for their own, no less factionalist, goals.
Nope numbers are correct romanian oil production in 1926 was over 3 million tonnes
Can changing military stance and tactics upset certain ideology groups?
For example, if I adopt the Police doctrine, would that upset liberal/democratic ideology groups due to increased government surveillance and police presence?