Bonyduck Campersang
Deity
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2022
- Messages
- 3,107
So that college students have been protesting over the Unmentionable Issue, and the authorities have cracked down brutally. Like this is going to change the protesters' minds. If anything it's going to make them look and feel more radical and revolutionary than ever. There's no attempt at engagement or conciliation, just an absolutely deranged pushback.
Also the blatantly deceptive way the protests are being covered and discussed. There's a lot of indignant puffing over the protesters 'preventing Jews from entering their classes.' This is of course an utterly stupid and inflammatory way to describe the protests considering a) a not significant amount of the protesters are Jews b) non-Jewish students can't enter their classes either. But here we an actual case of a Jewish professor being prevented from entering campus:
But of course it's the wrong sort of Jew so we won't see the antisemitism police talking about this.
There is little doubt that the brutal crackdowns are not so much due to the nature of the protests but rather due to being on the wrong side. There is plenty of evidence of violent actions from the counter-protesters on the right side, as in:
But what am I saying? Of course the only violent side is the side that's on the wrong side.
But on to something more specific, and rather awesome even by 2024's standards. The NYPD Chief of Patrol was interviewed on NewsMax. There was the usual guff about young people being radicalised and what not, but the Chief Doughnut-Muncher also dropped two very interesting pieces of information:
1) That the protesters were armed to the teeth with equipment they normally wouldn't bring to campus. Amazingly, the Pastry Prince holds up a bicycle lock by way of example. But even more amazingly, this particular bicycle lock is sold by the university at the campus itself!
2) That the protesters were reading books on terrorism. (Students? Reading books? The horror!) The Baked Goods Guzzler-in-Chief holds up a book by way of example and asks 'What class is this on?' The book is actually 'Terrorism: A Very Short Introduction' published by the famously radical Oxford Press, and is part of the curriculum for National Security and Political Studies.
So yeah, that's what you'd expect to get from ransacking a student's bagpack. But that's not all. Amazingly it seems that the NYPD didn't get this book from a student's bagpack, but photocopied the cover, blowing it up to double its size, and then presented it as being found among the students' effects.
So what happened is
1) police show evidence of radical material
2) actually radical material turns out be commonplace academic material
3) actually the sample the police showed was manufactured by the police themselves
4) the police did such a bad job of searching they couldn't even find the original book
5) so a cop just sat on a PC and googled 'how to do terrorism' and sent it to the printers
6) but no-one in the entire department could be arsed to determine whether the size of the printed cover corresponded with the actual
7) or even bothered to read the book
8) no-one also thought it suspicious that Oxford Press would be publishing terrorist material
Outstanding work all around.
Also the blatantly deceptive way the protests are being covered and discussed. There's a lot of indignant puffing over the protesters 'preventing Jews from entering their classes.' This is of course an utterly stupid and inflammatory way to describe the protests considering a) a not significant amount of the protesters are Jews b) non-Jewish students can't enter their classes either. But here we an actual case of a Jewish professor being prevented from entering campus:
Jewish professor banned from US campus after arrest
A Jewish professor was filmed being violently arrested during an anti-Gaza war protest at Dartmouth College.
www.aljazeera.com
There is little doubt that the brutal crackdowns are not so much due to the nature of the protests but rather due to being on the wrong side. There is plenty of evidence of violent actions from the counter-protesters on the right side, as in:
Israel supporters attack anti-war protesters at UCLA
A group of pro-Israel supporters have attacked anti-Gaza war protesters at the University of California, Los Angeles.
www.aljazeera.com
Tension grows on UCLA campus as police order dispersal of large pro-Palestinian gathering
About 300 people were arrested in crackdowns on pro-Palestinian protests at Columbia University and City College, New York's mayor says.
apnews.com
But on to something more specific, and rather awesome even by 2024's standards. The NYPD Chief of Patrol was interviewed on NewsMax. There was the usual guff about young people being radicalised and what not, but the Chief Doughnut-Muncher also dropped two very interesting pieces of information:
1) That the protesters were armed to the teeth with equipment they normally wouldn't bring to campus. Amazingly, the Pastry Prince holds up a bicycle lock by way of example. But even more amazingly, this particular bicycle lock is sold by the university at the campus itself!
2) That the protesters were reading books on terrorism. (Students? Reading books? The horror!) The Baked Goods Guzzler-in-Chief holds up a book by way of example and asks 'What class is this on?' The book is actually 'Terrorism: A Very Short Introduction' published by the famously radical Oxford Press, and is part of the curriculum for National Security and Political Studies.
So yeah, that's what you'd expect to get from ransacking a student's bagpack. But that's not all. Amazingly it seems that the NYPD didn't get this book from a student's bagpack, but photocopied the cover, blowing it up to double its size, and then presented it as being found among the students' effects.
So what happened is
1) police show evidence of radical material
2) actually radical material turns out be commonplace academic material
3) actually the sample the police showed was manufactured by the police themselves
4) the police did such a bad job of searching they couldn't even find the original book
5) so a cop just sat on a PC and googled 'how to do terrorism' and sent it to the printers
6) but no-one in the entire department could be arsed to determine whether the size of the printed cover corresponded with the actual
7) or even bothered to read the book
8) no-one also thought it suspicious that Oxford Press would be publishing terrorist material
Outstanding work all around.
Last edited: