Chocolate Milk Order of Operations
- Thread starter Fifty
- Start date
schlaufuchs
Break My Heart
Yes, I put in the milk, fill in a good 1/8-1/4 of an inch of syrup, then stir it up. I get the best of both worlds!
Fifty
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By the way, I want a c
KEEP TALKING CRAP SEE WHAT HAPPENS!
![[pissed]](/images/smilies/pissed.gif "Pissed [pissed]")
Boundless
Deity
ALWAYS a.
Tani Coyote
Son of Huehuecoyotl
- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 15,191
Have always been Option B.
Once or twice I did powder and put milk in afterward, but never really made it my primary method.
The equal amounts of chocolate will make it better for me in terms of taste.
Of course, I also add Equal to the mixture and cut back on the syrup. The syrup adds a chocolate taste, while the equal gives it sweetness.
Sure there's that whole "But it gives you cancer!!!111" thing, but as I recall, that's still not entirely proven - it was done with mice and as I recall, the human equivalent would be liters upon liters of soda a day!
Once or twice I did powder and put milk in afterward, but never really made it my primary method.
The equal amounts of chocolate will make it better for me in terms of taste.
Of course, I also add Equal to the mixture and cut back on the syrup. The syrup adds a chocolate taste, while the equal gives it sweetness.
Sure there's that whole "But it gives you cancer!!!111" thing, but as I recall, that's still not entirely proven - it was done with mice and as I recall, the human equivalent would be liters upon liters of soda a day!
Chukchi Husky
Lone Wolf
If it's because of the artificial sweetener aspartame, I read the amount you need for it to cause cancer is the equivalent of drink over 2,300 cans a day.
Tani Coyote
Son of Huehuecoyotl
- Joined
- May 28, 2007
- Messages
- 15,191
It was a lot, definitely. Not only has it only been tested in mice, but given the scale of things, the amount needed to gain a similar effect would be massive.
Things get overhyped, though. It's almost as if the sugar lobby wants to discredit the competition.
/conspiracyBut yes. It's a way to make chocolate milk taste sweet without quite as much chocolate.. or calories.
Rashiminos
Fool Prophet
KEEP TALKING CRAP SEE WHAT HAPPENS!
I can pour the chocolate milk and powder in at the same time, and save some stirring in the process.
Huayna Capac357
Deity
A. Delicious delicious chocolate sludge 
bernie14
Filter Manipulator
Reflexively, I go with A
..it just seems I have to stir a lot more using method B to get an acceptable "clumplessness" (perhaps because I am left handed 
)
However, I agree with Ziggy that the proper method is 1- powder 2-just a little milk 3- "emulsify" properly 4- add the rest of the milk .
Personally, I love hershey's milk chocolate but their syrup tastes like
)However, I agree with Ziggy that the proper method is 1- powder 2-just a little milk 3- "emulsify" properly 4- add the rest of the milk .
Personally, I love hershey's milk chocolate but their syrup tastes like
Kennigit
proud 2 boxer
nah we call it 'swiver's and cream', maybe topped with a 'red'.
swiver: sweet river, aka a sweet liquidy syrup. but naturally Cockney's had to 'chop the ends'
chop the ends: abbreviate; make shorter
cream: whipped cream or whatever you but on milkshake tops
red: a cherry, but we Americans make sure to put it "up over" as the Aussies call it.
on topic: I'm a B man.
Perfection
The Great Head.
I'm skeptical that B doesn't result in chocolate sludge.
Ziggy Stardust
Absolutely Sane
Well go forth and research then. Report back with results.
Chukchi Husky
Lone Wolf
But it's the way they tell you to do it on the packets.
Every time I've tried to microwave already-stirred hot chocolate, it has bubbled and (slightly) exploded all over the microwave.
Never again.
Chukchi Husky
Lone Wolf
Why not just use a kettle?
For milk??
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
