Llotyhy
Chieftain
Nice! Nitpicking! Ok...
I think Itzcoatl is the most important Aztec leader, but we can of course have a different opinion on that... Ahuizotl and Montezuma I are both on the shortlist of becoming the third Aztec leader, dunno yet though.
You're right, my bad, changed it, will be on next version.
Ehm... well, that's a different story. Stalin is noted wrong in the overview, I just realized, he's Philosophical/Industrious in the mod (that's not even debatable in my opinion, cause he wasn't aggressive at all.) Lincoln, well, that's nice of you to notice... if I could have made him 'just' philosophical I would have, but all the other traits didn't exactly fit in in my opinion, so I chose aggressive, but I think I will do as you said and change him into phi/org. It'll be changed next version as well. Philip II is far more organized than creative in my opinion... I think he should be most remembered for his organizational skills even. He disliked the idea of secretaries and such deciding for him, so he chose to read and reply to all letters by himself... the man organized an entire empire, not that easy.
Chandragupta will be in next version phi/spi as you said. Nice that we both seem to think the same thing. Charlemagne will be in as well, dunno about the traits yet though, will need to brush up on my reading.
Ok... but which one is the problem then? I tried to make them as accurately as possible. The choices are very limited though, I agree.
I *love* nitpicking... and it made me change two things in-mod and two things in mod-overview, so I'm glad.
niffweed17 said:its a great mod, but if you want suggestions, i think the leaders you picked and the traits they carry could use some work.
aztecs- itzcoatl is not a terrible choice, but i think that ahuizotl definitely deserves to be included more. hell, i think montezuma I did far more than montezuma II ever did.
I think Itzcoatl is the most important Aztec leader, but we can of course have a different opinion on that... Ahuizotl and Montezuma I are both on the shortlist of becoming the third Aztec leader, dunno yet though.
niffweed17 said:mali- sundiata agressive? that doesn't make too much sense to me. i'd change it to industrious/financial.
You're right, my bad, changed it, will be on next version.
niffweed17 said:furthermore, you appear to have three leaders being philosophical and agressive, namely alexander the great, stalin, and abraham lincoln. i don't understand the justification for either stalin or lincoln. i would recommend that stalin be changed to aggressive and organized, and lincoln be changed to philosophical and organized. philip II can be changed to aggressive and creative.
Ehm... well, that's a different story. Stalin is noted wrong in the overview, I just realized, he's Philosophical/Industrious in the mod (that's not even debatable in my opinion, cause he wasn't aggressive at all.) Lincoln, well, that's nice of you to notice... if I could have made him 'just' philosophical I would have, but all the other traits didn't exactly fit in in my opinion, so I chose aggressive, but I think I will do as you said and change him into phi/org. It'll be changed next version as well. Philip II is far more organized than creative in my opinion... I think he should be most remembered for his organizational skills even. He disliked the idea of secretaries and such deciding for him, so he chose to read and reply to all letters by himself... the man organized an entire empire, not that easy.
niffweed17 said:two more leaders that i would love to see: chandragupta, who could maybe be philosophical and spiritual. charlemagne, perhaps expansive and creative or expansive and philosophical.
Chandragupta will be in next version phi/spi as you said. Nice that we both seem to think the same thing. Charlemagne will be in as well, dunno about the traits yet though, will need to brush up on my reading.
niffweed17 said:the other thing is the favored civics, but to be honest none of the included civs make any sense, so i wouldn't fool around with them too heavily.
Ok... but which one is the problem then? I tried to make them as accurately as possible. The choices are very limited though, I agree.
niffweed17 said:sorry if this is a lot of nitpicking, but i look at the game from a perspective of historical accuracy.
I *love* nitpicking... and it made me change two things in-mod and two things in mod-overview, so I'm glad.