GenMarshall
High Elven ISB Capt & Ghost Agent
I would like to vote for Option #2
Originally posted by FionnMcCumhall
i didnt mean just the convictions, i mean all together.
Originally posted by amirsan
anyways, anything is good for me!
Originally posted by anarchywrksbest
January 1st?
You are planning to take 2 MONTHS to plan the next game?
This is the reason the demo games are short on members. You over complicate matters. If it worked in the past then use it. Make some minor changes but make them quick.
Old demo game ---> bish-bash-wallop ---> New demo game
Stop fannying about and get this thing a-going.
We realized this game that the relaxed ruleset doesn't work under pressure, so why not go back to the DG2 ruleset as a framework from which we can build our new ruleset, which will become the result of over a year and a half's work on demogame rules. Keep in mind that the bulk of DG3's ruleset will be incorporated in the DG4 one, as stated below.Originally posted by donsig
Bootstoots, the DG3 constitution is the result of over a year's work on demogame rules. Do you really think you all can improve on that in two months - especially if you're going to go back to the DG2 rules and try to *fix* them?!? We realized before we started DG3 that they weren't worth fixing, that's why we trashed them.
Why not take the DG2 laws as a framework and fix them as necessary, making additions and subtractions until we have a workable ruleset? The DG2 and DG3 constitutions aren't very different, and the DG3 PI system is probably going to be implemented in DG4 (which is virtually all of the DG3 CoL). If we already have a framework from which to make rules decisions, wouldn't it go along faster than coming up with all new laws from scratch?Why not keep the DG3 constitution, make a thread about what *laws* are needed, make threads about each *law* can be discussed and drafted, poll the things, and start the game already!