embargo city states

brewgod

Prince
Joined
Feb 7, 2006
Messages
403
Location
Jet City
Hello Fellow Civ Fans
Why is it that the AI typically will vote on embargo CS.
I find this so frustrating. I was able to repeal this but I also
Had about 35 votes.

Any thoughts would be great.

Brew God
 
I think is a decision made in order to secure (or at least try to secure) a diplomatic victory. If someone goes freedom they can easily steal allies with trade routes to CS. I've seen Greece propose this numerous times.

Also Merchant confederacy gives 2 gold form trade routes to CS. So anyone who got this will be directly crippled. Germany is also seriously crippled by this.

Another effect is if a civ already has an embargo it can still send routes to CS. If embargo city states is in already in place, embargoing another civ is a lot more powerfull.

A human player would propose this:
1) in order to secure a Diplomatic Victory if someone else went freedom, or make sure someone else does not win a Diplomatic Victory.
2) in order to cripple the runaway civ, combined with an embargo for that civ
3) in order to cripple players that finished Patronage (which may also want to get the level 3 freedom tenant that gives influence from trade routes)

4) in order to cripple the effect of the German Hanse.

So for an AI to propose this, as frustrating as that is (especially if you play Germany), it is strong play. I could even joke and say it is actually hard coded, that at some point if there is nothing better to propose, this gets proposed.
 
Doesn't that just about wreck Venice?

I don't think so as when Venice acquires a CS, it has the status of a puppet rather than a CS. Also typically the trade routes go to Venice, rather than the reverse.
 
Top Bottom