marioflag
History Addict
Considering that:
Battleship 40 Strength cost 225
Missile Cruiser 40 Strength cost 260 +4 missile load, causes collateral damage
Destroyer 30 Strength cost 200 can defend Transport, can see Submarines
Stealth Destroyer 30 Strenghth cost 250 can see Stealth units, cannot defend Transport, can not see submarines
Wouldn't be wise if Battleship and Destroyers don't get obsolete by these units?
Battleship costs 35 hammer less (on Normal) than Missile Cruiser, Missile Cruiser has +4 Missile load and collateral damage.
While Missile Cruiser has these good advantages it isn't always better than Battleships, because to defend your coast or control the sea you usually build a lot Missile Cruisers with an inadequate number of Guided Missiles (at least from my experience it's nearly impossible to supply a great fleet of Missile Cruisers with adequate number of missiles).Collateral damage is another advantage but on sea except when destroying an invasion fleet you don't need that bonus.Considered that, Battleship could be a "light" version of Missile Cruisers, less costly, same strength but without special abilities.
Stealth Destroyer and Destroyer are clearly complementary, unless there are some changes made to Stealth Destroyer.
So what do you think?
Battleship 40 Strength cost 225
Missile Cruiser 40 Strength cost 260 +4 missile load, causes collateral damage
Destroyer 30 Strength cost 200 can defend Transport, can see Submarines
Stealth Destroyer 30 Strenghth cost 250 can see Stealth units, cannot defend Transport, can not see submarines
Wouldn't be wise if Battleship and Destroyers don't get obsolete by these units?
Battleship costs 35 hammer less (on Normal) than Missile Cruiser, Missile Cruiser has +4 Missile load and collateral damage.
While Missile Cruiser has these good advantages it isn't always better than Battleships, because to defend your coast or control the sea you usually build a lot Missile Cruisers with an inadequate number of Guided Missiles (at least from my experience it's nearly impossible to supply a great fleet of Missile Cruisers with adequate number of missiles).Collateral damage is another advantage but on sea except when destroying an invasion fleet you don't need that bonus.Considered that, Battleship could be a "light" version of Missile Cruisers, less costly, same strength but without special abilities.
Stealth Destroyer and Destroyer are clearly complementary, unless there are some changes made to Stealth Destroyer.
So what do you think?