Fachy said:
So much for the first ammendment. A simple proof that the jews do control the world politically
Sulla Islam has stood strong for about 8 centuries, practically dominating the world, at the time when Europe was only pig farms and crazy people burning witches and people who claimed the earth wasn't the center of the universe. So don't focus on the last 2 centuries only, same goes for the Jews. Be fair.
First ammendment? What has the US has to do with this? I was mentioning the cases of several European countries, where the jew populations is nearly equal to nil. I remind you, I am not American. I'm Spanish. I don't give a damn about the US constitution, except as culture value.
Islam has dominated strong for 8 centuries... oh, god... so much from brainwashing
Islam never dominated its known world, not a *SINGLE* islamic country has ever been *the* world power (before the XVth century the term did not have a real sense, and then that role went to Spain in the XVI-early XVII centuries, France in the late XVII and XVIII centuries and periods of the start of the XIX century, England in the XIX century, US/URSS during the XXth century, and USA in the late XXth and starting XXIst century, with periods of equilibrium and transition from one time to other). Islam did expand significatively from the VIII to the XI century in a cohesive political unity. Still, when encounted significative ressistance, such as Byzantine Anatolia and past the pyrinees, it did not advance. These are 4 centuries at most, and again, advancing only through zones that had fallen in civil disarray or outright civil war (such as Visigothic Spain, or the decadent Eastern Roman Empire).
Anyway, speaking about 'islam' about being a 'power' is a contradiction in terms, from the moment the turks arrived. The seljuk empire or the ottoman empire maybe were dominant in their areas of influence, but 'islam' as such was not. It was a religion, something that you are quite, quite forgetting.
The first person who actually proposed heliocentrism was Aristotle (Greek and thus part of the Western tradition), and then the first one to actually propose a theory was Aristarchus (270 BC, again Greek). The only philosophers that referred to heliocentrism during the middle ages, dominated by the ptolemaic theory were Aryabhata and far later Bhaskara, who where from India and were not muslim.
The first person to actually finish a theory with empirical calculations was... Copernicus. Just go fancy. He nearly gets burnt from it, but his theory sticked.
Saying that Europeans had only pig farms (which I assume has an intended offensive implication) is completely false. Roman tradition and engineering was dormant, but was there, and was in many issues far superior to the muslim countries. By the XIIth century, christian european military science, land doctrine specially, were already significativelly superior. The crusaders only actually failed because of a still deficient immigrational techniques and movements, and having its real bases in Europe just too far away (and still, even in such accounts as the battle of Hattin, the christian soldier was far superior to the muslim one, who needed a good superiority in numbers to defeat small christian numbers). And the muslim war effort had already been destroyed by succesive invaders from the East. The turks, who converted, and the pagan mongols, who swiped through middle east and actually razed baghdad... it's a wonder that all so powerful muslims, the most powerful men in the world in that era, could not defend the supposed political center of their faith. And the mongols would only be defeated by the mamluks, which were a marginal and ex-slaved ethnics, and not the central ethnics or people who had really represented the center of the islam (truly the turks in a way and the mameluks were nearly as barbaric and certainly far more barbaric than the raising european people).
The swan song of superiority in any possible way of a muslim country was XV-XVII century Ottoman Empire. And then, after its initial expansion and millitar superiority (who was always marginal compared to their european neighbours) it was contained, then defeated, then pushed back at every term.
Still, by XVI century, western christian civilization was already neatly superior in every field (mathmatics, philosophy, architectury, art, economy, millitary) to their muslim neighbours. If anything, christian countries had been able to absorb succesfully any muslim advance during the middle ages, while any muslim countries revealed themselves pathetically ineffectual in doing the same with christian origin advancements.
So much for your mod being realistic.
About the holocaust, there were Spanish Republican exiled prisoners in concentration and death camps such as Matthausen. They were Christian and did not have any reason at all to lie about the holocaust (not even guilt), and their testimony is undeniable. The holocaust happened. Dennying it is not only irresponsible... but revealing a miserable spirit and aim.
Personally, I consider that anyone who tries to minimize or deny a genocide (not only this one, but any other) for any political reason is purely and simply pig excrements.
Feel free to play your mod, but don't try to tell us that is realistic or historical in any way, because it's clearly not, and any mantained claim that it is is simply self-dellusional.
THIS THREAD IS GOING NOWHERE!!!
Dude shame on you. Shame , shame. 
Its seem to me, that it's you way and everyone else wrong. 
That will be the best method of chosing the 
Your not going listen or to change you ideas.
If it was to produce a useable mod that does the job for the Forum, 
