i think you have done an excellent job on the leaders heads, excellent choise of leaders and traits
now the UU, i also agree that it is "overpowered" .... cav already have 15 power so an extra one really doesnt have that much effect, the extra movement is always handy 2 to 3 .... but i think a closer link can be found for the aussi troop
so what representation of aussi should their be?
the first aussi soldiers were the pommi redcoats ... pass
then we had the boar war ... mounted infantry, excelled on the open plains and the hills of africa ... nice start
now ww1, birthplace of teh aussi soldier, gallipolli, our anzacs, now these guys are the same mounted infantry that were in the boar war (we are more organised this time with the AIF) ... they amphibious assulted the turks that were in the fortified hills, got beaten back and retreated 9 months later .... these same guys at beershiba, cav charged the turks and took the town after several thousand british heavy infantry failed to take, but im sure you all know the stories and to these men that the aussi UU should honour
http://www.lighthorse.org.au/historicbw.htm
http://www.lighthorse.org.au/historic.htm
now for the name .... ANZAC is a good one but i take it from the name that CivArmy was looking for a more generic term as such, how about mounted infantry (would be espically good cause you keep the same graphic) and by making them a gunpowder footslogger it will stop them getting smashed by riflemen (which are just around the corner)
so with all this in mind (and mebey some other things?) what bonus should the UU have?
while trolling and thinking about this i came up with an idea, make the UU still replace the cavelry unit with a "mounted infantry" which is a gunpowder unit rather than a mounted unit (i think this would have a signifigant effect) and also adding the xp upgrade of "march" .... now we have a unit that moves quick MP2 attacks hard AT15 but it isnt "mounted" so doesnt suffer teh ill effects of riflemen and can heal on the move (giving them that extra survivability and duribility that the aussi soldier has shown) ..... i dont think that this is to powerful (only 1 thing has been increased) but will be signifigent in the game
any thoughts?
I kind of expected a reply like that from someone. I just didnt know if it would be from the Trotskyites (against Howard or Menzies) or from the neo-Cons (against Whitlam or Hawke etc). I dont care for politics. I try and assess things on the basis of facts, not hype or personal feelings. Whether you like him or hate him or think he does a good or a bad job Howards mark on Australian history is irrefutable. However, if you read the full post from which you quoted you will note that I tried to put balance into the whole thing. Perhaps it is best not to have any living person listed as a great leader to avoid too much controversy. All this discussion however is moot as I am quite convinced that CivArmy has made his final determination on who he creates as great leaders and he shows no signs of changing his mind; a balanced decision IMO. 
