mabraham
Deity
I updated my population counts.
[pre]
Civ T153 T163 T173
Us 103 120 147
GWN 80 96 103
WWN 77 82 85
GWW 77 82 96
WWW 54 58 76
GWS 100 120 131
WWS 88 100 125
GWE 93 100 89
WWE 70 86 90
Total 742 844 942
[/pre]
Currently our voting block of West-North-us has 506/942 votes. Asoka gets us to 595, which is 63.1%. So we are still on track, but we will lose a little of Asoka's population as he whips and we deal with border pops and unhappiness. We will need to make sure we leverage our growth opportunities fully, and consider taking a city or two from Ragnar if the opportunity presents itself.
There's some fudge in those numbers - we can't see four Ragnar cities, one Mansa city (probably on coast SE of capital) and one Shaka city (newly settled on the hub). South won't trade us maps either.
[pre]
Civ T153 T163 T173
Us 103 120 147
GWN 80 96 103
WWN 77 82 85
GWW 77 82 96
WWW 54 58 76
GWS 100 120 131
WWS 88 100 125
GWE 93 100 89
WWE 70 86 90
Total 742 844 942
[/pre]
So if we'd had a UN voting block with us from North and West on those turns, we'd have had 52.7% and 51.9% respectively. If we'd conquered all of Asoka (GWE), we'd have had 65.2% and 63.7%.
Currently our voting block of West-North-us has 506/942 votes. Asoka gets us to 595, which is 63.1%. So we are still on track, but we will lose a little of Asoka's population as he whips and we deal with border pops and unhappiness. We will need to make sure we leverage our growth opportunities fully, and consider taking a city or two from Ragnar if the opportunity presents itself.
There's some fudge in those numbers - we can't see four Ragnar cities, one Mansa city (probably on coast SE of capital) and one Shaka city (newly settled on the hub). South won't trade us maps either.