settler114
Chieftain
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2007
- Messages
- 44
actually the wii,360,possibly ds could be modifiedConsole games are teh suck. The only purpose of a Civ game is to modify it. Can't modify a console game!
actually the wii,360,possibly ds could be modifiedConsole games are teh suck. The only purpose of a Civ game is to modify it. Can't modify a console game!
Console games are teh suck. The only purpose of a Civ game is to modify it. Can't modify a console game!
IMO the trouble with CivRev is if it represents the future of Civ. Would you really want Civ5 to incorporate simpler features and focus so much on the cartoonish eye candy? If this is just a quick deviation to stir up interest for the Civ series that's alright and I'll just happily ignore it, but I have a feeling it's more than that simply because other strategy series have gone in the same direction.
May I ask - how long will last a game?
It sounds like Battle For Middle Earth 2.
Yet they also said after adding everything in it probably be more like 4-5 hour game.I'm pretty sure they said around 2 to 3 hours a game.
Not true. Last year more PC games were sold than all console games combined.there is far more money in console games than PC games
i think that PC gamers are such elitists that any game that was born/spawned on the PC must NEVER. EVER. EVER. make it to a console, or in their eyes it will demean gaming because of all the "kiddies" and "idiots" will play it and think "Durrrrgh PC's Are ST00pid"
I'm a Console Gamer, i think the general amount of hate towards console gamers is disgusting, if you don't like Civ Rev, go back to your Civ 2 Board.
/Rant
Where did you hear that?Not true. Last year more PC games were sold than all console games combined.
PC Gamer, a very serious PC-magazine.Where did you hear that?
Where did you hear that?Video games far outsell PC games every year...
Jon
I'm not sure what in that wiki link you're pointing to...PC Gamer, a very serious PC-magazine.
Where did you hear that?
Swedishguy
[WIKI]PC Games[/WIKI]
A wiki link. Now my argument is undefeatable.
Now that doesn't give figures on games sold, but it's pretty clear what is doing better, considering console games made $6.2 billion and PC games made only $1.1 billion. Not only that, but the numbers are increasing for video games and decreasing for PC games.The NPD Group tracks computer and video game sales in the United States. It reported that:
* Console and portable software sales: $6.2 billion, up 8% from 2003[30]
* Console and portable hardware and accessory sales: $3.7 billion, down 35% from 2003[30]
* PC game sales: $1.1 billion, down 15% from 2006[31]
That's from the United States only.I'm not sure what in that wiki link you're pointing to...
In any case, THIS is from [WIKI]Video Game[/WIKI]:
Now that doesn't give figures on games sold, but it's pretty clear what is doing better, considering console games made $6.2 billion and PC games made only $1.1 billion. Not only that, but the numbers are increasing for video games and decreasing for PC games.