So you enjoy playing civrev more than you do civ5?
Is that what you are saying?
"Civrev is in all aspects a superior product"
Or have you not played civrev?
Sure did, and do.
So you enjoy playing civrev more than you do civ5?
Is that what you are saying?
"Civrev is in all aspects a superior product"
Or have you not played civrev?
Sure did, and do.
What is it about civrev that you enjoy?
(Oh, and which console, by the way?)
I play it on the mac tablet while flying, excelent way to spend 16+ hours on an airplane(Not that it can hold the battery that long)
Just a thought, but if you haven't played civrev and are therefore voting for civ5 (or any of the others for that matter) because it's (believed) the worst of the main series, perhaps this poll is doomed to failure.
Honestly, if this poll ends up showing that civ5 is a worse game than civrev for the people who voted, something about this forum would just not make sense anymore. We have people complaining about dumbed down games, yet a game that is streamlined much more harshly than civ5 is considered to be more acceptable. (sarcasm removed)
Maybe people don't consider CivRev to be part of the main Civ series.
Kind of like most people don't talk about Final Fantasy Tactics when discussing the main Final Fantasy series. (Though some obviously due because that game was awesome).
Have you played CivRev?
So you are more likely to consider something good if you expected it to be bad?
This could explain some things, because I expected civ5 to be pretty bad.
Ok, so you're saying that some (note to other readers: I say some, not all) people are not voting for civrev because it's not part of the civ series and therefore shouldn't be in the poll, even though if they had played they would probably consider it worse than all the main 5 civ games.
Right?
I've got nothing against people who like civrev, and nothing against people who don't like civ5, but it is the thought that civ5, even with its flaws, is a worse game than civrev that I struggle with. I think I said it in another post, and you speak of it as well, but it's more about whether a game lived up to expectations than how good the game is. Ironically, this means that the more a game is hyped up before release, the more likely it is to be a 'bad' game to players who think that way.
I like Rev for DS. It's great for long trips and stuff like that.
Just a thought, but if you haven't played civrev and are therefore voting for civ5 (or any of the others for that matter) because it's (believed) the worst of the main series, perhaps this poll is doomed to failure.
Honestly, if this poll ends up showing that civ5 is a worse game than civrev for the people who voted, something about this forum would just not make sense anymore. We have people complaining about dumbed down games, yet a game that is streamlined much more harshly than civ5 is considered to be more acceptable. (sarcasm removed)
CivRev was made for XBox and PS3 in the first place, an IMHO on these systems the game shines because of the personality it produces from of the great human animations. The later console versions for DS and iPhone (not having the animations) are missing much. Even though the CivRev gameplay is pretty simple, I like it, because it is fast and can entertain you nicely for an evening. For a game that usually goes for about 3 hours, the simple rules and AI are fine, and I recommend CivRev to most of my PS3 friends.I voted for Civ Rev, but in all honesty I haven't played it much. I got it for my iPhone and never could get into the game, so ended up deleting it off my phone.