Ryika
Lazy Wannabe Artista
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2013
- Messages
- 9,393
Recently, Alexander Van der Bellen, president auf Austria, has sparked quite a debate after answering a question by suggesting that:
I translated it from German of course, my English isn't that good, so the translation may not be perfect. If you want the full context, search youtube for something like "Van der Bellen Hijab", I couldn't find a version of the video that doesn't have a comments section that is full of swear words, so I can't link it directly. (;
There is of course some delicious irony in saying that women should be allowed to wear what they want and then following up with the suggestion that it might be the moral duty of western women to wear a hijab in solidarity to those attacked for wearing it, but I think that was mostly him not thinking too much about the way he phrased it.
More interestingly, his statement and the debate about the statement made me remember an article I had read a while ago, of Iranian men also wearing the hijab in solidarity of their women. Of course the situation is a bit different, because these men wore the hijab in protest against the laws that force their women to wear it.
So, I'll go a bit further than Van der Bellen and also extend that invitation to all non-female identifying members of this community.
Three questions I have for you:
Assuming these apply to you, would you wear the Hijab in solidarity to...
...women in the west who are targeted for wearing the hijab?
...women in the middle-east who are targeted for not wearing the hijab?
Do you think we should actually follow through with Van der Bellen's idea and ask women to wear the hijab in solidarity if rampant islamophobia gets worse?
(After re-reading my post... knowing these forums, I expect some people will read this and come to the conclusion that I'm trying to make an example for how wearing the hijab out of solidarity in the west is absurd even though I never actually made any suggestion about that, so let me tackle that issue now so it doesn't have to be a discussion in the comments: I am not. I am very aware that both issues are separate from each other, and that while there is some irony to the whole thing in the greater picture, both types of wearing the hijab in solidarity may have some validity to them, and are tackling different issues.)
My personal response:
No, I would not wear the hijab in solidarity in either case. In the context of Iran it doesn't really seem to solve much, and in the context of the West, being asked to put on a religious item to make a social statement seems like a pretty ridiculous request to me.
"Is is the right of every woman to wear whatever she wants, that's my opinion on the issue. Not only Muslim women, every woman can wear a head scarf. And if it goes on like this, and with that I'm already on the next question, the actual rampant islamophobia goes on like this, there will come the day when we will have to ask all women to wear a headscarf - all! - out of solidarity towards those who wear them for religious reasons."
I translated it from German of course, my English isn't that good, so the translation may not be perfect. If you want the full context, search youtube for something like "Van der Bellen Hijab", I couldn't find a version of the video that doesn't have a comments section that is full of swear words, so I can't link it directly. (;
There is of course some delicious irony in saying that women should be allowed to wear what they want and then following up with the suggestion that it might be the moral duty of western women to wear a hijab in solidarity to those attacked for wearing it, but I think that was mostly him not thinking too much about the way he phrased it.
More interestingly, his statement and the debate about the statement made me remember an article I had read a while ago, of Iranian men also wearing the hijab in solidarity of their women. Of course the situation is a bit different, because these men wore the hijab in protest against the laws that force their women to wear it.
So, I'll go a bit further than Van der Bellen and also extend that invitation to all non-female identifying members of this community.
Three questions I have for you:
Assuming these apply to you, would you wear the Hijab in solidarity to...
...women in the west who are targeted for wearing the hijab?
...women in the middle-east who are targeted for not wearing the hijab?
Do you think we should actually follow through with Van der Bellen's idea and ask women to wear the hijab in solidarity if rampant islamophobia gets worse?
(After re-reading my post... knowing these forums, I expect some people will read this and come to the conclusion that I'm trying to make an example for how wearing the hijab out of solidarity in the west is absurd even though I never actually made any suggestion about that, so let me tackle that issue now so it doesn't have to be a discussion in the comments: I am not. I am very aware that both issues are separate from each other, and that while there is some irony to the whole thing in the greater picture, both types of wearing the hijab in solidarity may have some validity to them, and are tackling different issues.)
My personal response:
No, I would not wear the hijab in solidarity in either case. In the context of Iran it doesn't really seem to solve much, and in the context of the West, being asked to put on a religious item to make a social statement seems like a pretty ridiculous request to me.
Last edited: