Yet Another Political Test

Say what you will about gay marriage, evolution, whatever, but kindly stop making personal attacks on Nancy Pelosi's character. She is an amazingly intelligent and caring woman, and twice the human being that you will ever be.

I'm being dead serious here.

Funny, because I see posters on this forum do it all the time; since they fall in the accepted political sphere, the majority of users condone it. Not that I agree with your statement.

Quid pro quo, my friend.
 
Funny, because I see posters on this forum do it all the time; since they fall in the accepted political sphere, the majority of users condone it. Not that I agree with your statement.

Quid pro quo, my friend.

Oh I honestly don't give a crap about most of the other politicians that get dragged through the mud on a regular basis on these forums, Pelosi is just a politician whom I legitimately respect and admire and would rather Dommy not make these personal attacks while having absolutely no conception of the kind of person she actually is.
 
Oh I honestly don't give a crap about most of the other politicians that get dragged through the mud on a regular basis on these forums, Pelosi is just a politician whom I legitimately respect and admire and would rather Dommy not make these personal attacks while having absolutely no conception of the kind of person she actually is.

Fair enough. I can honestly respect that.
 
You are a Social Democrat. 12 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 78 percent are more extremist than you.



Weird test.
 
You are a social democratic Cosmopolitan. 13 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 62 percent are more extremist than you.

33% cosmopolitan
67% secular
31% visionary
26% anarchist
19% communist
7 % pacifist
6% anthropocentric
 
You are a National Democratic Socialist. 3 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 42 percent are more extremist than you.

 
What is that, like some sort of bourgeois spider?

Fake edit: I see what you did there.
 
Yeah, I flat out didn't understand a lot of those questions. I'll edit this post once I finish the test.

I'm not sure why they specify "Trotskyist", exactly, given the relatively specific theoretical implications the term has, but I suppose they are at least in the ballpark.
Oh look, Traitorfish is wrapping an -ism in quotation marks and questioning its appropriateness! :wow:

:D


EDIT: Oh crap, didn't see how old/long this thread was :wow:

EDIT2:

"You are a liberal Cosmopolitan. 4 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 45 percent are more extremist than you."

Sounds about right. I'm basically a Liberal. Generate wealth then redistribute a small part of it.



Spoiler :
 
You are a social democratic Cosmopolitan. 13 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 17 percent are more extremist than you.

 


You are a Liberal. 4 percent of the test participators are in the same category and 81 percent are more extremist than you.
 
"extremist" - one who disagrees with me, and I can't understand why.
 
Cutlass is hardly an extremist... He's pretty much the definition of mainstream when it comes to basic economic issues like deficit reduction.

Integral is waaaaay more extreme, advocating a radical overhaul of what the Federal Reserve targets in the first place, nevermind what it should do to hit the existing inflation target.
 
Cutlass is hardly an extremist...
No, he's pretty fare out there, in the utterly and completely biased zone.
Economically speaking, somewhat of an extremist, because there is absolutely no consideration of another perspective or middle ground... you know, kind of the definition of an extremist. I don't think he'd deny it.
 
Top Bottom