I haven't seen this mentioned in the thread but apologies if it has: according to this site the musketeer is a full 4 strength points stronger than the standard musketman (16 vs 20). Makes it quite a bit better than the CIV 4 version I think.
The grammar is rubbish even in the English version (e.g. you have constructed a walls in ...)
I wouldnt be surprised if the CIV team didnt make adjectives agree where necessary.
erm seeing as you're still on warlord, id forget about SE or CE or whatever and just learn how to play the game better - decision making, city specilisation etc. Who says you cant run some specialists in some cities and cottage others?
Cannot look at save atm but....
Ok so in terms of medium term strategy you've obviously got two choices.
1.Get the economy up and running, increase happy cap etc (looks like good food for specialists in Nuremburg Vienna Aachen and good commerce Prague)
2.WAR!
The latter is kind of make or...
Dont forget ziggurats with priesthood. Only downside of Sumer it would seem is that vultures, although they decimate archers, dont have great odds against axemen. Ofcourse if you get horses early enough then its no problem.
Never use mercantilism now tbh. In warlords and vanilla i found many civs staying in mercantilism for ages so it was pointless switching to free market. Now in BTS they seldom use it and often dont even revolt to it at all; so you can take advantage of free market more. Coastal cities with...
Wow i was expecting something more like "don't waste your time with SE - build cottages!"
The best (or one of the best) parts of SE is that if you're several techs behind all the other AIs you can bulb one and trade around to catch up. No tech trading is definitely a no-no. On noble i'd...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.