http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=389077
Seriously... this person was simply giving their take on the game which many of us have done over the past several days. The tone of the post was not inflamatory or hateful. There was no reason to close that thread.
I would suggest placing a garrison of your top-tech mele troops in each of your border cities and put 1-2 siege pieces on the tiles behind the city and away from your border. Connect all cities with roads. Then just turtle up and do as you like. If they cross your borders and you have a...
Thanks for the information.
As to his message, however, It sounds a lot like PR damage control for a rushed product. I won't believe anything these people say until I see results.
They should have just saved money and used the scene from Firefly where Wash is playing with his toy dinosaurs in the cockpit...
"We will rule over all this land and we will call it... this land."
What's your angle? Why invest so much energy registering in September of 2010 (the same month that the game launched) just to show up and make a troll bait post against people who don't like a game that you like?
Why would anyone do something like that?
Why would they do that?
Why?
1. A bug patch (a real one, not some tiny little hotfix that claims to fix things but doesn't).
2. As others have noted, a fully fleshed out tactical AI.
I have to agree with the OP. The more I play, the more I see behind the curtain and it seems like there's just no substance there. It took me YEARS to become a decent Civ IV player. In a week I was mopping the floor with V. Not only that, the numerous bugs and broken game mechanics just take...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.