Recent content by christos200

It's been ages. Is the community dead? Or does anyone have any plans to launch an IOT?

Glad to see people are still here. Is anyone planning on launching an IOT any time soon? If not, I might do so.

The concept sounds interesting. Are there still slots available?

Damn. I miss this place from time to time. Was hoping there would be some activity. Oh well, thanks for the answer.

Is this forum still alive? And does anyone plan on launching any new IOTs?

Is this alive? Can we still join?

Polity Name: Great Qing Color: Orange Territorial Claims: RL Qing borders + Vietnam Summary: History: 1. In 1787, Lê Chiêu Thống, the last ruler of the Vietnamese Lê dynasty, fled from Vietnam and formally requested to be restored to his throne in Thăng Long (present-day Hanoi). The Qianlong...

Thanks for the encouragement. I'll be doing so in the next week. I am currently in the process of finalizing the rules/setting. :)

Looking back at some old threads, I got nostalgic of the old times. Hence, I am thinking of GMing a simple, old-school IOT; a desperate (perhaps futile?) attempt to bring back this community and revive IOTs. I know it is a long-shot and I've seen the above posts mentioning how the forum is...

Nation Name: Kernow Leadership: Marcus Martinus Strength: [Determined by GM I suppose] Capital: Tregear Religion: Christianity Colour: Blue, but seeing how it is the same blue as that of Laighn, feel free to change it to some other blue. Description: Cornwall was rather remote from the centers...

Colony Name: Freedom Colony Color: Green Colonial Organization: The Premier is the leader of the colony. He is elected directly by all adult colonists for a renewable term of five years, and directs domestic and foreign policy. The current Premier is Jonathan Wilson. He is assisted by the...

Unfortunately it does seem there is a lot less activity. An IOT in the olden days, even with a badly written ruleset/OP, would get in a single day five or six players. Now, I don't see any IOT managing to attract more than four or so players. [It also seems my inquiry if anyone is interested...

Don't know if this is supposed to be sarcastic or not (ain't good at reading sarcasm online), but if it's genuine, then great. :goodjob:

Ain't on the chat, so don't know, but it sounds like a step in the right direction. Less toxicity, less arguments and more fun.

Just ban political discussions on the chat and focus entirely on games (primarily) and banter/memes/jokes (secondarily). If some people from IOT want a place to discuss politics, they can always create a purely political channel of their own. That way you don't get toxic political...