Recent content by Classenemy

I like the way in which the others have put the problem. You need to consider how playable a game is, how manageable and how cost-effective. The guys at Civ. won't make a game for a few fanatics alone. It has to reach the tens of thousands (maybe more) of players out there. Hence, I think the...

I like the idea of two maps. I think that would allow for more realism. let me explain: the map as it stands right now might be a good model map, as the kinds used in warfare. You know the cities' locations, topography, resources, what units are where, etc. But then you can fold the model map...

Well, let me tell you first what a D-Day type invasion looks like right now (from the Allied viewpoint): you spend anywhere between 50 and 100 turns to build a sizable army--with planes, ships, infantry, etc (by the way, in what reality do cities that have a population of 2 milion produce less...

techathon, thanks for your posting. I don't know if a non-realistic solution would solve the production fatigue. Yes, allowing for the simultaneous construction of civilian (including social and industrial) and military (including tactical and industrial) buildings would be a common sense...

What Civ 5 is going to be, the recourse to reality remains the most important feature. We have to face it, Civ 1 was the real hit, everything else just an adjustment to new technology. And the future is written in the stars, my friends. There is no escape from reality. Everything has to be more...

Hello list, And sorry if I repeat what others suggested before. I don't know this forum that well. By the way, is there a central place where all suggestions made for improvement are kept by topic? Anyway, there are many suggestions for improving CIV4 and won't bother you with all the...

Hello list, see next thread--this appears by mistake! Cheers