Recent content by deadeye943

I'm playing the latest SVN version as France. I'm stuck at year 1782, when I try to move on to the next turn I get the "waiting for other civilizations" message and the turn never advances. I'm guessing it's a problem with barbarian or independent units having trouble taking their turn. Does...

Anyone have a good Polynesian UHV strategy?

Ignore this post

Where's the Sultanate of Rum? There was place for it in the RFCE++ map and I'm pretty sure that this map is going to be the same as RFCE++. This civilization would make Anatolia much more interesting, but I guess it's not on the top of the list right now. The five most important civs to include...

But the problem is that all of these can be represented as part of the Great Britain civilization. Just like we can't include Scotland and instead we just represent them with another British city because their culture is very similar. It is is the same case for Australia. At the very most they...

Most of these ideas I like but I have some comments. I think the name changes to Most Serene Duchy of Venice or the Duchy of Venice, not sure though. If the game was expanded to include the 19th century (which I don't see happening in a very long time) then would you think it would be a...

Well if all of the RFCE++ civs are incorporated into 2.0 then I'm fine with doing a few civs at a time. This seems like a perfect solution to the HRE problem. If we enter the HRE mechanic from RFCE++ and also this system it would be great. We can do the thing that SoI does with non-playable...

I think I disagree with removing any RFCE++ civilizations. RFCE++ used to be my favorite Civ mod to play, but I stopped playing due to it being so outdated compared to the other mods like Dawn of Civilizations and Sword of Islam, Sword of Islam being in my opinion the most advanced of them all...

Since most everyone isn't liking the Peru idea, how about an Inca re-spawn that represents the nation of Gran-Colombia. This one civ could represent Colombia, Peru, Venezuela, and those other North Eastern South American countries. This would make South America made up of three civilizations...

From this mechanic we can also create four new playable civs to represent each region of South America. Gran Columbia (North), Brazil (East), Argentina (South), and Peru/Chile (West). I think the Peruvian/Chilean combination should be one civ since they would be under powered by themselves.

I think this would be amazing for a universal de-colonization mechanic. When a certain date is reached (or stability, whatever is best) the governing civ will be asked if he wants to let the civ go peacefully. If the civ (let's say Spain) chooses yes, then the new civ (let's say Mexico) will...

^This right here. Having to deal with those pesky minor religions in my opinion will be pretty fun. You can have the choice to accept them or persecute them. There can even be some random events concerning them. I think a nice way to represent them would be a corporation-like system. They would...

What I meant by Antioch is the city north of Jerusalem. But you're right everyone would just choose Jerusalem. So I think I have a different idea that's slightly more historical and will fix the choosing problem. How about instead of waiting until the European civilization that did the crusade...

If all you care about on Trabzon is so Europe could be at war with the Byzantines why don't you just instead set the target city as Constaintople because there actually was a crusade to capture that city. I also think France, England, Italy, and the HRE should get a chance to have their own...

I like Absinthered's idea better just because I don't think the papal states should ever be owned by another player. This will remove the whole papal politics in Europe from the game, thus removing some of the fun. The only civ that should be allowed to control rome is Byzantium for their UHV...