Recent content by FIRST FIRE

  1. FIRST FIRE

    Dawn of Civilization General Discussion

    And another thing what I'm considering for a long time is that how modern ideolegy effect relationship betwen civlization. I think ,there could be a easy way to add it to Doc. the civ which have same modern civ will get relation closer ,and hated those guys differen form them.For some...
  2. FIRST FIRE

    Dawn of Civilization General Discussion

    Hello,Leo,I had played DOC for several years ,and I still feel it is a wonderful mod! I have played Japan civ from yesterday,and what I'm considering is that--of course the Up of Japan is powerful,but hard to control,many time I have to change my research plane because of some ai's attitude...
  3. FIRST FIRE

    Suggestions and Requests

    And there are some considers and suggestions that i feel they are interesting:D 1.Change Canada's Mounted Police to uu,but not ub.Because when you play as Canada,you always prefer to not declear war to other civs.So the ship uu is so useless(if america declear war to you ,it cant help you at...
  4. FIRST FIRE

    Suggestions and Requests

    How about decrease japan's resaerch modifier?Because it is too hard for finish japan's 3rd uhv.Maybe 100 is fine?
  5. FIRST FIRE

    Need some help with Japan

    I considered what the most important reason about hard to finish japan's 3rd uhv is that japan's research modifier are 120,but about America uk and germany, their fix are not more than 90.Which means you have to spent 30% and more:science: to finish an tech when you compite with other tech...
  6. FIRST FIRE

    Suggestions and Requests

    Sorry for my poor English:dunno:
  7. FIRST FIRE

    Suggestions and Requests

    Ok,there are some reasons why I think so: For gameplay: 1.tech timing:I exactly can get the [labor right] in the 1850s ,and [macroeconomic] in the 1920s, but only in the time when I play as prussia or other tech leader civs.Even in the 1950s,there are less civs can get [macroeconomic],which mean...
  8. FIRST FIRE

    Suggestions and Requests

    Thanks for leo's working,I really enjoy with playing the 1.16! I am glad to see the changes of techtree and civics,which are the progress make itmore historical than ever! And well,there is also a suggestion which I think is important to post here:maybe the techs those unlock the [central...
  9. FIRST FIRE

    Dawn of Civilization General Discussion

    About the central planing ,I found that tech of it is much later than the machine tool and engine,so even though I play the as russia or india ,but I would finish factory and coal plant in almost my cities before i get the tech of communist.So how you who played the communist civic think about...
  10. FIRST FIRE

    Dawn of Civilization General Discussion

    I remember one guys who have notice that shuold there a civic or wonder to buff the citizen of specialist .And I remember one guys who have gave a opinion that shuold there be a civic or wonder to buff the citizen of specialist .Should it be a good idea that make Citizenship civic to buff the...
  11. FIRST FIRE

    Dawn of Civilization General Discussion

    We know that, when the game go into globle age you usually have to spent three or more great peoples to start a golden age ,but it usually too difficult to collect so many types of great people. So,how about buff the Demacracy in this way?To start golden age don't need defferent types of great...
  12. FIRST FIRE

    Dawn of Civilization General Discussion

    Sorry for my offence word.I don't want to sarcastic anyone in my heart so I feel shame for what I express.
  13. FIRST FIRE

    Dawn of Civilization General Discussion

    The AI is stupit.And how this explain so many Demacracy nations have been built in 19th and 20th?I don't think those Demacracy natiions were built by America's spy
  14. FIRST FIRE

    Dawn of Civilization General Discussion

    Modern china have many modern building to add happiness in big city .And the max unhappiness decide to numbers of trade route ,which won't became too much 。
Top Bottom