Recent content by Goliht

Hmm, if you need to get rid of a cs you now have to wait.. just because some players want to put envoys in them. The city state suffers because it doesn't protect itself, the core design of the ai and how it protects or attacks is a known issue, the problem is compounded by limited resources...

What constructive feedback have you offered? I said some of the design is bad, what you're objecting to, not really.

I have. Many times. Yes, if the ai is currently "at war" it will usually continue to fight the cs. But if you get there first you can usually lure them away. You can cap their cap and swap it in peace talks for the cs and then liberate the cs if you don't want to travel. Yeh there's bad...

Technically it's on an endless timer, if you use the cards and depending which government you're in, you'll always get envoys every x number of turns. Oh I understand very well, you don't like the truth. Learn to play.. I think that's the correct term. Please cease trolling others. leif...

I disagree, if you're going out on a limb to invest in somewhere that is difficult to maintain, it's your own fault if someone else takes that away from you. By default, if you don't prepare for everything, only one to blame is you. I always have soldiers guarding my important city states...

If you protected your investments, you'd not loose any.

Really don't understand this complaint that england is weak.. esp not in combat a free melee unit from every city captured, not on own continent, is a massive boost after a few cities. You end up with so many soliders in domination runs you're deleting them just to free up resources and your...

The bonus to liberating the city state is to put it back in play, doesn't matter if you're suzeraine or not, you're taking it out of direct control and you get a huge respect bonus from the ai civs for liberating it. That's plenty of reward. Sure if ai's have spare envoys they'll dump them...

If you have envoys you protect the city state with your own units. Just stick envoys in and then leaving it alone is suicide, the ai will definiately try to kill it off if it's making you more powerful. Nothing wrong with the ai doing this. The main complain seems to be the ai attacking city...

Yeh that was a perfect site for an early campus and or holy district next to it.. amazing mountain bonus. This is the worst issue of this build, Civ's starting literally 2 tiles from each other. I had hoped china would try to move at least a few tiles from border, but it literally built...

Still making 500 gold per turn in industrial era onwards.. trade routes might well get nerfed but gold making has not.

In general the ai seems to attack cs's with a purpose, either to remove an ally of another civ from the game or to access a resource they need. It doesn't seem like they are doing it out of wanton apathy, it could be the city is in an ideal location for one of their own cities as well, they...

This is because you cannot pass units through enemy lands like you can in neutral lands. You cannot even swap units in many cases that are in combat. These are pathing bugs, not ai bugs.

Ah the Win - Win complaint.. there will never be a good ai.. in Civ.. because it there was, noone would beat it. It is that simple. There are improvements to be made, ie I'd like to see the ai actually using aircraft to attack with, not building them and flying them around as defensive...

The leader sex aspect is just marketing pr really. Leaders should be the most evil, the most amazing, the most entertaining.. who they were or looked like is pretty immaterial and if alt right or left or middle or lost politics don't like it.. well they can build a time machine and go back and...