Recent content by Krikkit1

5 and 5 in Antiquity

I think they need to do a few things with Alliances 1. Have the acceptance/proposal screen show the other leader's relationship with all other civs (ie Friendly, Hostile, War, Neutral, Allied) 2. When you ally with a civ, your relationship with all Other civs they are not Friendly with takes a...

Please No more Cult / Exp... maybe make them Cult/Milit/Diplomatic/Scientific (the closest thing Google finds to their Wonder name is the name of a town in Iceland that was the site of an important school... so maybe Cult Scientific)

Almost Certain Iceland will get Relics from Exploration/Natural Wonders somehow (like Assyria/Mongols.. standard path nerfed... so alternate path opened)

There already are bonuses for handling the Crisis (in terms of additional Legacy options). It would be good if those were both expanded and better shown (History tab should be used a lot more)

Crises could Easily be made harder/easier for individual players. If the you want 3x the units on Invasion, just get 3x as many units to target Player X and then have less or more target Player Y. That is probably something they need to do if they want the Crises to be serious. (so they don’t...

With 1.3.0 the Sawmill doesn’t have to be on a river..is it still able to be built on a navigable river?

Are you sure... if you get the alliance and then the civc don't you get the trade route then?... shouldn't the same apply to "getting their Capital in Range"

Yes but that's at least a semblance of a path (instead of Mississippi/Maya into Hawaii)

The Inca never called themselves that either. And if there is an Exploration Age civ that would have called themselves Romans... it will be called Byzantines. (I could see a Holy Roman Empire though)

What I could see. Conquered settlements taken while you are at war with the original owner, remain in unrest until 10 turns after you were last at war with their original Owner Conquered Settlements that are not originally yours on capture experience 10 turns of Revolt... (where...

Well the datamined 4th Age was referred to as Atomic Age. (Which seems reasonable since nukes are The Big thing in terms of pre v post 1950) However I’d imagine it going from ~1960-2060 (ie going to near Future…Tier 3 military being Drone Focused…Mars Colonization being the science win) So it...

Also they might pick some of those "never played" in future rounds if they eventualy want to see if this would get them back (although more likely that would just be a free weekend for everyone once they have the implementation that they think works well.)

True cold War (ie the Pax Atomica) would be ideal for a 4th Age... because its an age where Civs(ie Nuclear powers) can't take settlements from another civ. Instead all military activity is with Independent Powers and City States. (ie nonnuclear powers)

And that's when you realize buffing the saw to a chainsaw was a bit much