Recent content by Lazy sweeper

BZzz... I can't receive... interferences... sorry... com lost... ...bzzzbbzzz...

You GET to choose your Leader when you choose your Civ... You just DON'T know WHEN your Leader will appear in the game... It might appear in the fourth turn, or in the 20th turn... but you WILL get the appropriate Leader for your Civ... maybe even TWO... and then you can CHOOSE which one to...

I'd say goodbye to idea of monetizing new Leaders packs... that would be new...

Dynamic Leaders > YES Dynamic Map (with Ages changeS tham Map, keeping the first Seed)) YES Dynamic Civs > NO Unless you don't file one line argument to convince me, it is a blunt NO, and will remain so. UNMOVABLE, UNQUESTIONABLE, sovereignty over your CIV, is one of the CORE tenet of Civ. They...

read this : https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/no-leaders-on-start-new-idea-thread.700794/

New "DYNAMIC" LEADER thread here: https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/no-leaders-on-start-new-idea-thread.700794/

The general idea is to just Start the Game and choose, pick your civ of choice. Without ANY Leader attached to it. Then, throughout the game, depending on your behaviour, achievement, etc, a Leader is born. Inside YOUR civ. And the same happens to all other Ai civs. It can happen at different...

The day people will be able to play as FRANCE, US, etc with (my opinion) to NOT have ANY Leader to choose from... from the get go, is where and WHEN things will turns.

can you take a screenshot of the map and post it? Or make a short vid with Obs so we can see it???

That is just outside the scope of this thread

After 6 months of patches updates and millions video reviews, it would be quite appalling for one to buy the game now, get burned, and leave a downvote... the surprise effect is gone... If 1000 gamers were given Civ VII for free and give it a feedback, we would have a relatively accurate picture...

I thought someone actually played continuous civs, but this is all speculation... What already exists are other threads that tries to redefine what already exist, giving more options. Options. But no. Only devs played with this "option". The best course of action is a strong word for one that...

Fecicious admittably. I think it's been since Civ II that we don't have Lunar-space settlements anymore, maybe even Civ I... My memory tricks me going that much back..

GAMEPLAY is vastly superior with passable Mountains! Water should be the natural impassable feature, with exceptions for light arm units and sea units. You got this all wrong, it's been 15 years that this gameplay has been going on... And in any case, in 15 years of devs, not once, it was...

Re-start from scracth, evolve, end Civ VII complete roll-out in one more year MAX (3x Main updates, paid EXPANSIONS, 1x each semester) Now move on from the old Civ V 2D board map, and actually try make a proper Civ VIII, with EVERY feature that was in Civ IV. Retain new Voronin map gen, Reduce...