Recent content by magicfan101

please dont use Mein Kampf as proof that hitler was a creationist. this book was a propaganda tool used by Hitler.Hitler was an agnostic or atheistic evolutionist, he just lied to get what he wanted. The nazi regime was anti-christian and anti-Semitic. Hitler just took the theory of evolution...

this where i disagree with you. even people like dawkins believe the genome has information. http://www.skeptics.com.au/publications/articles/the-information-challenge/ he uses Shannon information shannaon information

askthepizzaguy what evidence would you accept for creation? what would prove a designer? i just showed a butterfly that can alter light waves to form a unique and beautiful pattern on its wings. with plenty of non creationist sources. of course keep your suggestion within reason.

i actually read your article last time. probaly forget to leave a post about. several points why his math model is wrong 1st.there is an intelligent designer behind the program 2nd. mutations are blind there is no spy telling organisms the correct answers. thats cheating. 3. he ignored bad...

gene duplication is the only mechanism that i've heard that can cause a increase in information. im surprised no one has brought it up yet. it such hypothetical and improbable event that needs to be repeated millions of time in order for it to cause evolutionary change. as i understand it gene...

i read every post you have written. the basic argument you present is random mutations + natural slection + deep time = every evidence for creation is invalid. your formula is flawed because mutations cause damage to the DNA. nothing in this world exist that has repair system to fix something...

?????? unfortunately mutations during mitosis are not passed on to the offspring. plus mutations are random during meiosis.

random mutations + natural selection + deep time= the supposed debunking of all creation evidence. so every-time someone brings up random mutations as a way to explain away my evidence for a designer. i will offer a counter arguments against mutations. giraffes do not simultaneously grow parts...

world population---6,889,326,227 Familial combined hyperlipidemia ------ The prevalence of this disease is 1–2% in the general population ~ 137,786,524 Familial hypercholesterolemia------heterozygous FH occurs in approximately 1 per 500 persons worldwide. ~ 13,778,652 Dominant...

i can not prove the entire human population has genetic disease unless everyone was tested but harmful disease can not be naturally selected out untill they are the expressed gene. which only happens when mother and father have an exact copy of that defect. so harmful mutations are slowly...

God is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient. now lets randomly shuffle words. odg is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient dog is omnipotent, omnipresent and omniscient. information changed but dog is no longer intelligible within the sentence.

your post depends on the assumptions laid on the fossil record. a perfect case where assumptions went wrong is the moas . http://www.abc.net.au/rn/scienceshow/stories/2009/2642628.htm

try randomly shuffling the words on your post. the words change but the meaning and information is now lost. ive provided an entire list of genetic disease caused by mutations that is evidence most recent common ancestor is an historical figure it only changes based on the underlining...

just saying sexual selection does not win the argument. plz provide a process through mutations(genetic mistakes) that a butterfly could have gained the information to alter light waves. no information gaining mutation has been observed in a laboratory. its always a loss of functionality. i...

gliders did not elvolve to birds it takes more than wings to fly