Recent content by no-genius

I didn't have any cows! :P I tend to build an archer, maybe another warrior (or spearman if I've got bronze working yet), and then build a settler and a worker.

The thing I always like to do is (if I'm the strongest civ) attack the 3rd-strongest. Seeing as the 2nd-strongest will probably put up more of a fight.

I realise that I never start attacking until ~500AD, sometimes later. I think generally, I like to wait 'til I get the Swordsman, because thats the first good attacking unit. Would it be better to start attacking earlier?

That's why I like to build a few warriors/ archers, or a barracks before I build my first settler. Same for workers in new cities, although I guess the worker could build up the tiles, so that doesn't really make sense.

Grenadiers are good for doing damage, even if they lose.

I got a sold out copy for £.98 a few years back. :D