I see your points, but it is still easier to gain more point with a huge map? Give me that at least? Or is there more civs in that to???
However if there´s not, the scores would´n be compareble, and that is what I think is irritating..
No, that´s the point.. You can win just as quick with a large map, because you will have more cities - resources and men!! -More manuel work though.
It makes no sense that way? You see??
Just wondering if it really could be the fact that, civ calculates the score ( among other ) from territory-size, without taking in consideration how big a map you´re playing.
I think standard should be random and then small should be multiplied up and larger maps should be divided? -Or...
I have played since Civ II at regular basis, and not that I often need a loan ( practicly never ), but I have tried once in a while, just to se if it was possible..
But now I´m think it over again, it´s proberbly because I already have hustled all AI gold :king:
Hey.. I´m playing a game right now ( standard ), where there only is one source of rubber!! Thats pretty ****ed up - cuz it is not at my territory :cry:
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.