Recent content by Smidlee

There are plenty of ignorance to go around since evolutionist will often use ignorance as a defense of why some evidence does not fit their theory.

Trolling? I'm not the only one who stated that and they are not always creationists. I've posted what we know as facts which are based on today's knowledge and how they apply to understanding the past. A lot of ToE is nothing but story telling.

Evolution itself is a creation myth.

So eating chicken is evil? Yet the scripture does claim during the reign of Christ there were be world peace including the animal kingdom yet at the end men will hate it so bad they will raise up against Christ the first chance they get. Peace is something we know deep down is good yet it's...

computer programs has a bad side effect ( bad if you want to use as examples of evolution) , You can measure the information built in a program from the actually information being produced by the engine. Often the actual information being produced is very small. Also these programs are examples...

If the unexplained X is contradicting evidence than it should be used against the theory. If contradicting evidence is not allowed to be used against a theory then it's unfalsifiable. Evolution is having trouble explaining all the contradictions and tries to use both "A" and "not-A" as evidence.

Again stating what we do know and what we don't is not argument from ignorance. Saying "scientist so far haven't figured out how to turn off gravity" is not the same as saying "scientist will never learn how to turn off gravity." I proclaiming what we know so far. What we don't know is...

I have made the point before , either way it's a matter of faith; either Life created the universe or universe created life. Both sides do agree on certain things. For example there has to be an unknown and unseen form of life which is not like physical life today which needs very complex...

Stating what we know and what we don't is not an argument from ignorance as I pointed out before. If that so then it goes both ways. I'm not arguing from ignorance but point out our ignorance. This is a very sorry defense since there will be always things we don't know. Any thing that uses the...

You have to believe by faith since the only known physical life known to man requires today's laws of physics. Again a building something out of wood or metal are a lot more stable than known physical life. This is the problem ToE has always been too simple to explain the complexities of life...

Math along doesn't equal reality. While math is extremely handy you have to found a way to put the math to the test in the real world.

This is also a serious problem as you need a huge population to help find these rare small beneficial steps yet lab studies so far has shown these rare mutations doesn't become fit in the population in sexual creatures. (the lab is more ideal for evolution than raw nature yet still has serious...

Which I do. Like I mention I read scientist commenting on the fact how little effect natural selection has in reality. It's the same with the article I posted which shows lab studies so far show sexual creatures resisting evolution. Again it seems natural selection can't detect these "small"...

time itself is not enough, it take planning to come out ahead. As far as only the "IN" group are the only ones who are allowed to comment on the subject ,this is nothing but a cult.

the problem with this video like most of these computer programs is when it comes to odds a lot of time the best fit doesn't survive and/or are not obvious at first . This is why some scientist have noted random events seems to make natural selection to have very little if any effect. If you...