Recent content by The Ninja

Ninjas all the way. (But the who else would I vote for?)

You sir, win.

What do these Chinese think they are doing? Mocking France is an American and British pastime! :p

Not so. We can do it! [/optimism.] Seriously though, I'm not exactly sure why it seems to keep dying out. It seems like there are a lot of people still interested, but no one seems to want to do anything.

Unfortunately, actually writing a constitution is something I'm not very good at. The best I could offer would be to take the old one from Civilitas and alter it a little, which I assume would not be what we want. (If I'm wrong, however, tell me and I'll get right on it.)

That shouldn't be a problem. Welcome aboard.

Ground rules first, then constitution, then game. (Ok, so I over simplified. Sue me.)

I agree full-heartedly with all of Splime's recommendations. They are definitely the way we need to go if we want to see this thing get off the ground. (City and provincial governments was just taking the whole thing too far, too fast.) I also agree with ArneHD. 75% is about all we can ask for...

This should definitely be handled from the ground up. Parties shouldn't be until after this whole thing is up and running. (Even if just.) A BoR shouldn't be even considered this early, that should be for if we get into the game and decide that something's missing from the constitution. (Much as...

*Begin Personal Opinion* I've used both Mac and Windows (Ever since OS 8 and Win95), and I must say that I've always find Macs to be the best of the lot. Yes, PCs do play more games, but what is often overlooked is that most games are made for PC not because it's a better platform, but because...

I also agree with Catharsis, but having little experience in NESing personally know of no one to nominate.

I wouldn't change mine. On a lot of forums (The America's Army and the Keenspot ones in particular,) I can't get this one, so it was really a surprise for it to be available. So....I'll stay.

Just a note, I will probably re-found the ION party. (re-found, not continue.) The positions and such will get a going over and revision for the new 'parliament'. I do agree, however, that we need to start fresh. (Hence the term: re-founding.)

Of course. I just wanted to get the idea out there for consideration.

I had an idea a while back that I think will prevent another incident like that one. Basically we establish ground rules for calling a 'vote of no confidence' in an inactive GM. Possibly have requirements to be met first (Number of inactive days, etc.) and then require at least a majority vote...