Surprised to be the first to reply after all these months.
I've installed R&F only a couple of weeks ago, keeping my promise to myself never to buy a Civ game upon first release. While I thought Civ 6 had "potential" I also thought it was one of the worst, most unplayable games I'd ever bought.
Now, while I think I really like R&F a lot it would be hard for me to overstate my dislike and disdain for the maps. I believe I get one playable map in about 20 rolls. Frequently, no rivers, flat lands offering only 1/1 production, i go for days without seeing a rainforest on a map. There's more emphasis on tundra and desert than on fresh water. There are other map offerings that still offer no improvement, just different maps, TSLs are popular, personally haven't liked the ones I even. I added the Got Lakes? mod which solved the river issue but the maps are pock marked with lakes and feel like playing on a slice of Swiss cheese.
Some players prefer to take whatever they roll. I watched a tutorial at the Deity level in which the player was completely hemmed in. The player then methodically wiped out three neighboring civs in short order. He knew all the bonuses, how to set for maximum bonuses. I will never be such a player, because for one thing, I haven't the time to learn to maximize city placement for wonder effects, or what I need to do to get a boost on most tech tree elements.
So, after getting bored through roll after roll turning up the traditional, really lousy Civ maps, my interest in R&F is fading. I suppose the well beloved In Game Editor (IGE) is gone for good - and it would do so much to spare the futility of re-roll after, re-roll if it were back. .
