This has nothing to do with being frustrated from downloading something and not getting what i want - it happens all the time, and it doesn't faze me, it's a normal part of the internet experience.
Although now you mention it, it's a little frustrating when i try to inform someone of something, and they continually miss the point. (a vital part of the internet experience too - you should get a job with ebay customer service)
I can certainly change the name of the download if that is what you are getting at
Well, that's more or less exactly what i said.
My whole point this time has been that you seem to have an erroneous description for the download.
remember a patch is often thought of as a "fix" which is a very loose term. Patch does not really imply anything gets fixed, nor does it imply that your program will operate better or even the way you want it to after using it. Sometimes the magic works, sometimes it doesn't. Ask the guys at Microsoft, their still trying to figure out the meaning of the word patch.
I'm unsure what you're trying to say here.
Are you trying to justify calling that program a "patch" by arguing that the definition of the word "patch" isn't clear?
http://www.google.com/search?q=define:patch
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patch_(computing)
That program does not match ANY definition of the word patch in any way at all.
It doesn't try to do anything magic, that's the point. It's not a patch, it doesn't try to be a patch, the programmers never intended for it to be called a patch. You're the only one calling it that.
If you really don't know what the word patch means: then great, consider yourself further educated on this fine day, i was happy to be a part of the expansion of your understanding of words.
I would even change the name to exactly what you post here if that will make you feel better--maybe we could call it "module killer" or "after crash thingy" --just tell me what you want and we can do it.
Why not call it "The Civ Killer", as the creator named it, and describe exactly what it does, instead of making up names and descriptions that bear no relation to the actual program?
Keep up the good work.
