Revolutions

[Own]

i think in Civ4 that revolutions should be more realistic. in civ3, you just chill for a few turns, and voila! you get the government you want. i was thinking new civs (maybe one or two difficulty levels worse) would appear as parties, take over a few cities, and you'd have to fight them for the government you want.

this is the "big picture" i'm giving everyone. have anything to add on?

 

[Aramda Master]

i think in Civ4 that revolutions should be more realistic. in civ3, you just chill for a few turns, and voila! you get the government you want. i was thinking new civs (maybe one or two difficulty levels worse) would appear as parties, take over a few cities, and you'd have to fight them for the government you want.

this is the "big picture" i'm giving everyone. have anything to add on?

There are revoulutions. Democracys have them when stay at war for too long.
Revoulutions in CIV 3 are damaging at times (Civil disorder destroys buildings, no money output.)

 

[Own]

i knew there were revolutions, but i think you should have to conquer other parties to win the government you want. in the russian revolution, lenin didn't wait 7 turns of anarchy and then he got communism. same with the french, american, etc.

maybe if you lose the revolution fight, whatever party conquered you is what government you'll get.