Turn 49 - 1830 BC

Cheetah

Deity
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
8,010
Location
the relative oasis of CFC
Nothing much happened this turn. Changed our new city to Curragh, moved the Warriors, moved the Curragh and found a Goody Hut. This probably means that there isn't anyone on the other landmass.
 

Attachments

  • Map - BC 1830 - The New World.jpg
    Map - BC 1830 - The New World.jpg
    38.8 KB · Views: 151
Our Northern/Eastern Warrior is continuing to head south while the C3B Warrior still camps at the Mountain.
 

Attachments

  • Map - BC 1830 - East.jpg
    Map - BC 1830 - East.jpg
    55.6 KB · Views: 111
Demographics:

We're second in GNP and Land-Area and 3 in Mfg. Goods. :)

Btw, I think C3B just built another Settler.
 

Attachments

  • Info - BC 1830 - Demographics.jpg
    Info - BC 1830 - Demographics.jpg
    79.8 KB · Views: 115
Do you think C3B will be expanding down toward us with this settler? :(
 
A message from Peggar:
Pggarian (9:33:20 AM): just one thing
EmperorNapoloen (9:33:23 AM): yes
Pggarian (9:33:35 AM): I'm still waiting the turn
Pggarian (9:33:46 AM): cheetah sent the wrong one
EmperorNapoloen (9:33:53 AM): o ok
Pggarian (9:33:55 AM): it was CGN's turn
EmperorNapoloen (9:33:57 AM): i will say something
EmperorNapoloen (9:34:08 AM): thank you for telling me
Pggarian (9:34:30 AM): I posted, yesterday, on the turn thread
Pggarian (9:34:35 AM): but yet no game
EmperorNapoloen (9:34:39 AM): sorry

Cheetah can you fix this for us?
 
Is he angry or simply asking? Cause he didn't say please and you apologized... I think he needs to be a bit more polite :rolleyes:
 
One note to prospective DPs:

We do need to be quite mindful of the UN Turn Thread, as well as the MSDG email. I always made a habit of checking both at least 2-3 times a day. For one, it gives our DP a good chance to see how the game turns are progressing and to anticipate when they may get the save. And secondly, it allows us to catch reminders such as the one above and react to the issue before it ticks someone off. :)
 
Emp.Napoleon said:
He is just asking, from the times I talk to him he always acts like that.

In our list of complaints I think that we should list his attitude toward us :lol:
 
It was resent some hours ago. :)

And I don't think he was to unpolite at that instance. Short and to the point. I think that is ok.
 
Hm, maybe I took it the wrong way, but I still think it sounds rather demanding and impacient :rolleyes:
 
NeoDemocrat said:
Do you think C3B will be expanding down toward us with this settler? :(


What are you talking about? :hmm:


First goody hut we see IIRC, yay! :yeah:
 
Just a thought.... Lets keep a warrior or two posted close to where they have a warrior posted on the mountain. We have no ratified reason to retreat to our home and I would like to have an extra 5 turns heads up if they plan on sending some immortals..... actually, that would be better than a dmz. If we let them post a warrior on the canal and they let us post a warrior on the mountain they are currently on neither team could slip troops by without each other noticing. It could go a long way at easing both teams fears of being sneak attacked....
 
I agree, now let's not retreat, they have insuted us, and we will pay back.
 
Hm. An interesting idea! Though one would only know if an attack is coming, not how many units it is, since anyone who attacks would finish of that sentry first.

Don't know if I like to have a C3B unit that close anyhow...
 
Just as long as it is only a single warrior who cares? I don't believe either team has a player capable of wiping out a civilzation at this stage with a single warrior. Perhaps akots mabey...
 
Hehe. No, what I was pointing at was that we would only know that an attack was coming. We would not know how many units they send, or what kind of units.
Therefor, I just question the value of a warrior so close to their borders.
 
I think until SoZ is built it is risky to make any threats :rolleyes:
 
Back
Top Bottom