when monarchy is invented ,should we go into revolution emidiatly?

[TheDuckOfFlanders]

Well ,as we are researching monarchy for the moment.I just wan't to poll for youre oppinion's on when to go into revolution.
(what a strange thing to do from a leader's point of view :crazyeyes )

About option 3. In civII new goverment's are alway's declared on a certain turn interval.It's IMO unneccesary to keep the nation in anarchy for a few turn's ,while we can do it in one turn.

 

[Sodapop]

Well, I didn't know there is special interval when the anarchy is less longer. Next time I'll play I'll try to use them... But if you know when the best moment is, you have my vote behind you president ducky

 

[Pggar]

I'm with Unknown. If there's a specific interval lets use it.

 

[Alcibiaties of Athenae]

I think it's called "Oeo years' or something like that, but it's always on even numbered years.

 

[Knight-Dragon]

This Watcher concurs with Emperor Duck's suggestion. If there's a way to minimize the Anarchy period while chging govt, by all means, go ahead and do it.

We can ill-afford a badly timed or long revolution at this early phase of the game IMHO.

Add - I didn't even know there's such a thing.

 

[Juize]

The formula when to start revolt works every 3rd turn, like :
0001-0001-0001 (when the first 0 is 4000BC)-

So you have to calculate it from first turn.

The turns when is good to revolt:

3rd turn
7th turn
11th turn.
15th turn
19th turn
23th turn

and so on...


I have read it from War Academy, about 2 months ago.