In the darkest hole, you'd be well advised
Not to plan my funeral, before the body dies...
If we don't deserve it, neither do the Bantus. If we're going based on the original owners of the land, it should all go back to the Khoisan. If we're going based on who currently owns it, and who acquired it legally, it's us. If we apply some twisted pretzel logic full of special pleading, we can make a case to give it to the Bantus.
Even in African countries where there are very few White people, there are still riots.
What events have led to the recent violence in Uganda, where rioting broke out following opposition candidate Bobi Wine's arrest leaving 45 people dead.
www.lifegate.com
Even if we gave up everything and left the country, you would still have riots and power struggle between various Bantu groups, between Bantus and Coloureds (this is the proper term in South Africa, it refers to a group of multiracial origin, I know Americans don't like it, though) and Indians, etc...
So, by robbing us of our land and wealth and ethnically cleansing us from our home, you wouldn't stop the riots, you would merely change the groups involved in them.
No, Javert was a tragic hero, or maybe a tragic antihero. It's a story of a man with impeccable character who decides to end his life rather than live in debt to a criminal. Let's look at his situation:
Valjean, an escaped convict, had joined the rebellion, which had captured Javert and wanted to execute him. Valjean volunteers for this role, and takes Javert into an alley where they cannot be seen by the rebels. He shoots a shot that intentionally misses Javert (so that the rebels hear a shot), and the lets Javert go, telling Javert where he can find Valjean when the rebellion has been suppressed.
Javert, at this point, has two equally bad choices. He can either
1. Go to arrest Valjean, the man who spared his life ("live in the debt of a thief")
Or he can
2. Let Valjean go, and thus shirk his duty to the law ("yield at the end of the chase")
Since neither of these options is ethically defensible, he chooses to instead commit suicide in order to escape from the world of Jean Valjean.
A man so devoted to justice that he sacrificed his life rather than his morals.
You could at least ask for something in return, i.e. more English language in Maori communities, for them to dress in a more Western way, for them to go to Christian church, etc...Essentially trade them money for Westernization.
Our situation was completely different than yours. We were surrounded by hostile enemy nations starting in the mid-70s, getting worse when Rhodesia became Zimbabwe, etc...and Boers were outnumbered by Bantus, whereas Anglos outnumbered Maoris. So it's not a really fair comparison. We were in a much more precarious position, geopolitically, demographically, and diplomatically (since we received far more grief from the international community than you did).
And now, New Zealand has become a target for mass migration.
Once again, one of the last socially acceptable prejudices (anti-white) makes an appearance! Imagine if some US politician, say Donald Trump, had said "whites are better immigrants than a good chunk of Syrian refugees." Imagine the outrage and uproar there would be. But for some reason, almost no one cares if White South Africans are insulted...back to the topic of Les Mis, as Valjean sings in his Soliloquy, "I have come to hate the world, this world that always hated me." White South Africans have received a disproportionate amount of hatred from the world compared to what our people have done in history...lots of countries have done far worse than us, and received a fraction of the hatred. Mugabe killed more people than Dr. Verwoerd, yet Mugabe got to live out a long, luxurious life, and Dr. Verwoerd was brutally murdered by an alt-left fanatic. All the horrible things the communist government was doing in China, yet we got far more sanctions than they did in the 1980s.
