The Hot Pink J. Crew Trans-Gender Crisis

I see a difference in someone mentally ill and someone making an actual cognizant choice to kill people for their religion. Dont you?
Was Abraham mentally ill or about to carry through with a cognizant choice? And if not mentally ill, how do you see him differently than the mothers I mentioned?
 
I wonder how many effeminate men have been beaten to death by Muslim fanatics compared to Christians.

Mom "spanks the gay out" after he is caught pouring "sand on each others' butt cracks" at the age of 5...


Link to video.

"Once gay" Christian "therapist" shows how to properly hug men while beating a surrogate mom with a tennis racket:


Link to video.

I think it is clear those are both examples of serious anger management issues which now need professional help.


So treating homophobic bullying as bullying is condoning homophobic bullying, WTFH?
You mean you actually think treating it as a minor problem instead of major issue is the proper course?

Spoiler :
"Their resistance to homophobic bullying policies fails to understand that young children, regardless of their sexuality, can be victims of homophobic bullying. "They fail to see that it destroys children's education and wider life chances. The Catholic Church is abdicating its responsibility to look after the health and well-being of youngsters."

Ms Keates said one in five teenagers reports being a victim of homophobic bullying. There is evidence that some bright 16-year-olds were being turned off education because they were the victims of such abuse at school, she said. Youngsters do not have to be gay or lesbian to become the targets of bullies. Children can be taunted and called "gay" for their behaviour, appearance or mannerisms, she said.

Having personally handled numerous of such cases successfully (from the victim's point of view), I know for a fact that the Catholic Education Office, among others, will pay out hundreds of thousands in hush money to victims suing for breach of duty of care in order to prevent the scandal from reaching a court, which would carry with it considerable ignominy for the Church, set legal precedents and possibly judgments for far greater amounts. These lawsuits have now become so widespread that certain law firms specialise in them and usually provide their services 'pro bono'.

Refusing to single out homophobic bullying for extra attention, the Catholic Church is signaling that — contrary to all evidence — such bullying isn't a real problem. This, in turn, implicitly sanctions such bullying as being no worse than the average sort of schoolyard assertiveness and annoying behavior that always occurs. In effect, homophobia is reduced from a serious problem with life-long consequence to childish name-calling.
You really can't ignore homophobic bullying in hopes it might go away all on its own. It is apparently now an inherent part of Catholic schools in England, and I suspect elsewhere as well.
 
Uh probably more than half teenagers are bullied and calling someone homosexual is the lowest fruit there is, I for example was bullied until a rumor passed around until that I bagged 24 year (WTH??).
 
Was Abraham mentally ill or about to carry through with a cognizant choice? And if not mentally ill, how do you see him differently than the mothers I mentioned?

Excuse me, don't lump us all in with the fundamentalists. I think Abraham was a lunatic who got lucky and really wouldn't condone 'trying this at home'. At the end of the day he went off to kill his son because 'God told him to' - doesn't that sound like the motivation for a lot of TV-show psychopaths?

Again, this is why I wont vote for atheists for any public office. The insistance that the religious are all mentally ill is just beyond rude.

Oh come on Mobby. Considering that the difference between him and our tv-show-lunatics is that we have the Bible's word that he was actually inspired by God - that's fantastic until you remember who wrote the parts of the Bible in question and the fact that they considered Abraham the father of their race. Not to mention that the argument that 'some atheists are rude, so none of them make decent public officials' is beyond stupid.
 
Was Abraham mentally ill or about to carry through with a cognizant choice? And if not mentally ill, how do you see him differently than the mothers I mentioned?

Again, this is why I wont vote for atheists for any public office. The insistance that the religious are all mentally ill is just beyond rude.
 
Uh probably more than half teenagers are bullied and calling someone homosexual is the lowest fruit there is, I for example was bullied until a rumor passed around until that I bagged 24 year (WTH??).
I think you are confusing all-too-typical childish name-calling with repetitively making serious acts of violence, which the Catholic schools in England apparently do little or nothing to stop. It is this general condoning of violence against effeminate men and homosexuals in both our cultures which allows homophobes and femophobes to claim so many victims.

Even the transsexual woman who was recently beaten in the McDonalds was likely a victim of this same attitude.
 
I think you are confusing all-too-typical childish name-calling with repetitively making serious acts of violence, which the Catholic schools in England apparently do little or nothing to stop.

In fact, you could say they do no more than any other school does, being no more than a school can - schools actually don't have nearly as much power as they'd like to stop bullying because their teachers can only really influence those who respect them, and people who consistently break the rules tend not to be the ones with respect for those that enforce them. It's not as if they're OK with it happening - bullying directly leads to lower exam results leading to less funding and the attrition of the school's reputation, not to mention the fact that almost all of the teachers I've worked with took the job and still do it - despite it being hugely stressful and far more work than the pay would suggest - because they really care about helping children and they understandably really don't like seeing their kids bullied. I actually saw this come to a head outside of the school once when (the school was a state grammar school in a fairly rough area; the pupils got a fair bit of stick from the locals, especially my guys in the cadet force) two or three kids on bikes were tormenting one of the pupils leaving school - just as a member of PE staff walked past and proceeded to give them a peice of his mind, unfettered by any guidelines or legislation that normally hold that sort of thing in check at work.
 
I think there is a huge difference between homophobic bullying and normal bullying. While neither should be condoned in any school, I think it is quite clear that homophobia and femophobia should not be tolerated at all.
 
Again, this is why I wont vote for atheists for any public office. The insistance that the religious are all mentally ill is just beyond rude.
I have not called anyone mentally ill in this thread. You are the one that ascribed mental illness to those exhibiting signs of religious devotion (unless you are saying you are an atheist and would never vote for yourself).

I merely asked how far your diagnosis of mental illness went. I would really like to know how we can distinguish between the father of 3 religions or someone that is mentally ill, when the basic difference appears to be that the father of the religions heard contradicting divine commands during his potential child killing and the Mobby-diagnosed mentally ill heard consistent commands.

It is the height of hypocrosiy to call someone mentally ill and then get on a high horse against someone who has not called anyone mentally ill under the accusation that that person has called someone mentally ill.

Pwn goal perhaps.
 
Many Christians seem to think they are actually being persecuted for their religious beliefs when people are merely objecting to them trying to force their own provincial attitudes on everybody else.

Blatant intolerance of effeminate males and homosexuals are excellent examples. For some reason, they feel inordinately threatened by those who merely have different lifestyles and priorities than their own.

If they feel that way towards those who pose absolutely no threat to their own way of life, how are they going to react to people from other countries with radically different cultures?
 
Blatant intolerance of effeminate males and homosexuals are excellent examples. For some reason, they feel inordinately threatened by those who merely have different lifestyles and priorities than their own.

Honestly, I think it has more to do with certain people scrambling to maintain their own veil of fraudulent heterosexuality than pure intolerance of people who are different. I feel that that is where the perceived threat comes from. If you think sexuality is something so malleable that it can be swept aside by a colour, well, then you're probably already lying to yourself about your own preferences.
 
I think Mobby only made that generalization to avoid answering the question.
 
I think you are confusing all-too-typical childish name-calling with repetitively making serious acts of violence, which the Catholic schools in England apparently do little or nothing to stop. It is this general condoning of violence against effeminate men and homosexuals in both our cultures which allows homophobes and femophobes to claim so many victims.

Even the transsexual woman who was recently beaten in the McDonalds was likely a victim of this same attitude.
Bullying is treated as bullying and violence is treated as violence, what is the problem? You read something about how Catholic schools are only treating bullying as bullying and not making a special category for homophobic bullying and then you assume it is saying they aren't punishing violence as violence. This is exactly what happened with the whole death panel thing!
:sad:
 
It is the height of hypocrosiy to call someone mentally ill and then get on a high horse against someone who has not called anyone mentally ill under the accusation that that person has called someone mentally ill.

...Savvy?

That reminded me so much of Jack Sparrow's speech to the two bemused Royal Marines aboard the Dauntless in the first Pirates of the Caribbean film.

Honestly, I think it has more to do with certain people scrambling to maintain their own veil of fraudulent heterosexuality than pure intolerance of people who are different. I feel that that is where the perceived threat comes from. If you think sexuality is something so malleable that it can be swept aside by a colour, well, then you're probably already lying to yourself about your own preferences.

What, homophobes are all secretly gay? Probably something to be said for that, although continuing that logic we conclude that racists are all secretly black... may be more complicated I think
 
I hope next time you mention something that some folks in a group do, you quantify how many of those folks do it, and proclaim whether they're really a member of that group, and whether the group recognizes them as part of it.

I have always done that around here at CFC, you should know that.

Again, this is why I wont vote for atheists for any public office. The insistance that the religious are all mentally ill is just beyond rude.

The very next page.
 
Bullying is treated as bullying and violence is treated as violence, what is the problem? You read something about how Catholic schools are only treating bullying as bullying and not making a special category for homophobic bullying and then you assume it is saying they aren't punishing violence as violence. This is exactly what happened with the whole death panel thing!
:sad:
Because the public schools are taking far greater measures to directly try to deal with this obvious problem which is far more serious, while the Catholic schools are not? Now why is that?
 
Back
Top Bottom