adhiraj.bose
Deity
I thank all the Amatya's for their well thought and constructive advice on this matter. Here is how I summarize the conclusion of this meeting.
There were three options laid before the learned Amatyas. The first option was to aid the Parthians unconditionally and participate in the war against the Yavanas. The second alternative contemplated that we be uninvolved in this war, but assist the Persians with monetary aid. The third alternative involved supporting the war, but only if Persia acceded to our empire and submitted themselves as a protectorate.
Amatya Buddhagupt and Senapati Dushyant supported the third alternative while Raja Perun Gilli and Amatya Gyananand supported the second alternative. Amatya Chanak II attempted to provide a fourth alternative which would serve as a middle path between both the second and third alternatives. The fourth alternative by which we refrain from intervening in the Parthian war with Greece, but do so only if the Persians are losing territory to which we assist them in taking back these territories.
By my reckoning, this alternative is vague in that it does not clarify on the question of incorporating Persia as a protectorate. Without any tangible gains arising from an intervention, I do not see how we can participate in a war that would require much resources from our side without resultant benefits. Likewise, if it were only about upholding the high prestige and honor that Bharat enjoys in the world and to uphold the dharma that states one should give shelter to those who seek refuge, then why would one bother with conditions ? However, it is clear, that all ministers are in favor of refraining themselves from actively participating in the war, but this does not preclude us from assisting our neighbors in need. On this point I much appreciated Amatya Gyananand's suggestion of invoking the debt later thus bringing the persians under our influence. Amatya Chanak II agrees to this proposal.
On the question of assisting the Parthians in their war against the Yavan, I thus conclude our policy. That we shall not partake in their wars, but are ready and willing to give assistance in their efforts. Send a messenger to the Parthian emperor, informing of this resolution. I declare this meeting concluded.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Update on this will come tomorrow.
There were three options laid before the learned Amatyas. The first option was to aid the Parthians unconditionally and participate in the war against the Yavanas. The second alternative contemplated that we be uninvolved in this war, but assist the Persians with monetary aid. The third alternative involved supporting the war, but only if Persia acceded to our empire and submitted themselves as a protectorate.
Amatya Buddhagupt and Senapati Dushyant supported the third alternative while Raja Perun Gilli and Amatya Gyananand supported the second alternative. Amatya Chanak II attempted to provide a fourth alternative which would serve as a middle path between both the second and third alternatives. The fourth alternative by which we refrain from intervening in the Parthian war with Greece, but do so only if the Persians are losing territory to which we assist them in taking back these territories.
By my reckoning, this alternative is vague in that it does not clarify on the question of incorporating Persia as a protectorate. Without any tangible gains arising from an intervention, I do not see how we can participate in a war that would require much resources from our side without resultant benefits. Likewise, if it were only about upholding the high prestige and honor that Bharat enjoys in the world and to uphold the dharma that states one should give shelter to those who seek refuge, then why would one bother with conditions ? However, it is clear, that all ministers are in favor of refraining themselves from actively participating in the war, but this does not preclude us from assisting our neighbors in need. On this point I much appreciated Amatya Gyananand's suggestion of invoking the debt later thus bringing the persians under our influence. Amatya Chanak II agrees to this proposal.
On the question of assisting the Parthians in their war against the Yavan, I thus conclude our policy. That we shall not partake in their wars, but are ready and willing to give assistance in their efforts. Send a messenger to the Parthian emperor, informing of this resolution. I declare this meeting concluded.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Update on this will come tomorrow.