tommy61157
Chieftain
Personally, I think Civilization Revolution was just a horribly watered down version of a civilization game. Yes, the graphics did look pretty compared to civ 4 which was the only PC civ title at the time. But I play a game for gameplay, not graphics. Watered down Tech trees, victories, units, lack of map and civ customization, omission of religion all played a role in this. Plus, I dislike how they made all the leaders so cartoonish. Everything was just too simplified and made the game feel cheap and sort of like more effort went into the graphics than any other actual mechanic of the game. Plus, if you're going to make DLC, I wish it would add better and grander content, not just wonders, scenarios, and map packs.
So, I have two questions to ask people on this forum.
1. Do you agree or disagree with me and why?
2. Do you think they should make an effort to make a Civilization Revolution 2, port the Civilization PC titles, or not even try to get into the console market any more at all and why?
So, I have two questions to ask people on this forum.
1. Do you agree or disagree with me and why?
2. Do you think they should make an effort to make a Civilization Revolution 2, port the Civilization PC titles, or not even try to get into the console market any more at all and why?