@ nabaxo - More spam
.
Make a point and I will respond to it. I cant respond to your spam because there's nothing to respond to
(And I can walk and chew gum at the same time ol Buddy
as in I can mock your spam "ad hominem" while simultaneously responding to valid substantive points made by others
)
@ azza - Again fair points/distinctions. On the second one it seems we agree, and we just differ on how important of a factor it was. But that's all subjective. We both agree it was a factor so I'll leave that alone.
As for your first point, again its a fair distinction (no need to accuse me of "intentional misrepresentation"
). I think its important to note that in adition to finding that there was no way to prove misconduct, the admins ALSO suspended (or recommended suspension) of the Turnplayer from playing the turns. IMO that was the straw that broke the Camel's back and caused SANCTA's turnplayer to quit. It seems we disagree on that distinction. You feel strongly that it was righteous indignation over the accusations. I don't know that I can be persuaded that that is true, even by the player himself (who I have since sympathized with on that incident BTW, and even invited him to join AMAZON last game, which he accepted, don't know if you knew that, but just an FYI).
But even assuming that we take your feeling on the issue as correct, that it was
the accusations rather than the admin action ie., the whole investigation/inquiry/suspension drama and all the shame and humiliation that went along with it, that induced him to quit. Even if you are right, we still come back to the reality, that if we have a hard-coded Anti-Doublemove Mod, then there won't be anymore Doublemove related accusations for people to quit over. There wont be anymore Turnorder related controversies for admins to conduct investigations, inquiries etc over. That is my point.
(Not @ azza)I would also like to say, that I find all the complaints that the Mod hasn't been tested enough a little bit disrespectful to the Civ community that has been using it all this time. I mean they have been really good sports about it, but those of you saying that its "untested" and similar things... "Untested" by who? You? The FEW Civ clergy that you happen to worship
? To say that it's untested because "Oh those noobs over at Spanish community don't know how to properly test a Mod?" Is that what you mean? It's not truly tested unless the high and mighty all knowing english speaking sites test it first?
Maybe that's not what you mean, but that's how it sounds to me.