Realpolitik of the Smoky Skies - The Reboot

The Zealot

Reactions to Constitution Alteration (Rights and Freedoms) 1833

I have heard many reactions to this bill. Most of them are positive, but even in the most ringing endorsements the assumption has been that these bills only apply to legal equality and not economic or social equality. This disappoints me greatly. I was hoping that these bills were a sign that the nation was ready to take the hands of all of its citizens and work towards a common goal together, but in the end we are only willing to take false steps to trick our consciences back into their slumber. Pulias cannot remain segregated the way it is now. There are two nations, one of the majority, and one of the minority. These two nations like Pyramus and Thisbe whisper to each other through cracks in the wall, but otherwise do not acknowledge each other. We must make these two nations one. To keep them separate and pretend that they do not influence each other, that Pulian culture has not been influenced by those we look down upon and oppress, is futile and short sighted. Whether we wish for it or not, these worlds will come together one day. Will the collision be a tragedy, or a new beginning for all men and women to explore the wonders of this life with dignity? I cannot tell for certain, but if I begin to lay the ground work down, if I speak about the need to treat all men with dignity, if I live my life on that principle, then I can go to God and tell him with confidence that I have discharged the duty he has set before me as best as I can. For God Himself has already spoken on this matter. Did He not say in the Deuteronomy 10: 19, "You shall love the stranger, for you were once strangers in the land of Egypt"?
 
I agree with much in the latest article in the Zealot, but I think one must look at the big picture rather than just the one bill. Earlier Senates have adopted revolutionary social policies of Socialism, Communism, and Planned Economy which might not have affected the political sphere much but drastically prioritised the rights of the masses over the privileged few. The Rights and Freedoms bill was always intended to be specifically directed towards legal justice, an area long left behind, as social and economic justice is in my opinion best achieved through social policies and the everyday politics of orders which directly affect people's lives.
 
Didn't we decide the social policy Communism was a misnomer and should have been Nationalisation? :p
 
Perhaps we did but that doesn't change my argument, the policy had the same effect whatever its name was. :p Nationalisation, along with Planned Economy, was an important tool for bringing ownership and future development of Pulian industry in the hands of the Pulian people, increasing the freedom of workers along with increased production when the primary goal of industries no longer was to generate the most profit with least amount of expenses.
 
Today's edition of the Godwin Herald contained the following article:

Accusations Abound in Anthem Affair
by Gilbert Granville

It here follows:

Spoiler :
After seemingly waiting in hiding since the news broke, the government minister at the centre of the scandal rocking the Gurra government finally faced up and allowed an interview. I was the fortunate journalist to be the first to not only break the story, but also the first journalist to interview the disgraced minister.

We met in Senator Melda's office in Senate House. I received many blistering looks from staffers on my way through the hallowed halls of the Senate building. It's interesting how often those who shine light on corruption are blamed for doing so rather than those who actually perpetrate such acts to begin with.

Nonetheless, I had a job to do.


G. Granville: Minister, thank you for agreeing to this interview.

W. Melda: I'm not doing it lightly. Some of my colleagues feel it is best for me to not even engage with this, but I feel to not explain myself will allow all sorts of rumours and nonsense to fly about and besmirch my reputation.

G.G.: Yes, it is safe to say that your reputation is in tatters.

W.M.: Thanks to people like you.

G.G.: Now, now, minister, I wasn't the one who abused my authority here.

W.M.: I dispute the notion that I abused my authority!

G.G.: Indeed? Do you deny recommending your son's composition be made our national anthem?

W.M.: No, but—

G.G.: Do you deny that this is a conflict of interest?

W.M.: That's not what—

G.G.: Do you think the voters of Haven of—

W.M.: That's enough!


There is was. The famous Melda temper. His voice had thundered through the halls of Senate House, and a senatorial staffer looked in briefly to see what the commotion was all about. The reminder that he had failed the good voters of his home city must have hit home. The minister looked at his clenched fists in surprise, as though he hadn't realised he was now standing aggressively. For my part I remained seated and nonplussed.


G.G.: Why don't you explain to the readers of the Godwin Herald, and the taxpayers of Pulias why you feel you weren't at fault here?


He sat down, defeated and deflated. The fire had gone out of him as quickly as it had flared. This was not the Melda temper I had read about after all. I had read about the lengthy, passionate burning speeches; the rumours were either wrong or Senator Melda was going soft in his old age.

He began very quietly.


W.M.: I . . . I was concerned. Yes, I was concerned that there would be a perception of bias in this matter. That's why I went to such great pains to avoid it.

G.G.: How did you try and "avoid it"?

W.M.: Well, as anyone in Cabinet will attest, I firstly declared my personal conflict of interest in the matter and left the concept of possibly adopting Pulias, Rise Like a Phoenix as a national anthem to Cabinet. I left the matter with them and left the room. They then discussed it among themselves and decided not to pursue the matter.

G.G.: That's all well and good, if on a technical and procedural level. But you can't deny this whole affairs smacks of nepotism.

W.M.: No, I can't deny that it will look like that to some people. But as cultural minister I had an obligation to serve the interests of Pulias in the cultural sphere, and in my view I couldn't very well ignore a piece of music that I felt perfectly encapsulated the very soul of modern Pulias just because it was written by my son.

G.G.: That all sounds very noble of you, minister, but "I had no choice, I had to do it" all comes across as a bit pat. Like a self-justification or rationalisation. It also doesn't deny that you and the government as a whole have paid a very high political cost.

W.M.: I knew there would be a political cost but so be it: I tried to do the right thing, and I tried to be as transparent and uninvolved in the process as possible in order to minimise accusations of bias but I guess there was no point in any of that because it was going to happen anyway. Outlets like yours saw to that.

G.G.: Minister, we only go where the news is. And this is an incredibly newsworthy matter well that very much sits in the public interest.

W.M.: So you say. I was just trying to do my job. It wasn't even adopted as the national anthem. And I knew it was going to blow up in my face had it been adopted but I would have failed in my duties as a minister had I ignored this piece and its potential.

G.G.: Given that you've resigned as Minister of Culture, do you concede you did in fact fail as a minister?

W.M.: . . . Yes. But I had the best intentions and discharged my duties in good faith.

G.G.: So you say. Have you heard from the Emperor about this matter?

W.M.: . . . Not directly. Once I read of the Emperor's displeasure I immediately drafted my resignation letter and handed it to the Prime Minister.


I must confess that Minister Melda seemed more deflated and defeated than I expected. I guess I was expecting more defiance other than that brief glimmer of fire I witnessed. I had tougher questions I could have asked but he had capitulated so readily it didn't feel sporting to metaphorically kick him while he was down.

How the Gurra Government responds next with this anthem business will be interesting to see. The Emperor has made His Majesty's wishes clearly known and understood. Will the government accede to it?

The coming days are sure to be most interesting indeed.

Despite claiming a high profile scalp, I don't think we've heard the last of this affair.
 
((Note: if you want to listen to the composition referred to in this article by the cultural reporter, the link to do so is here. Enjoy!))

Today's edition of the Godwin Herald also contained the following article:

Fiendishly Frightful, Ferocious Folly
by Isaiah Meriwether

Spoiler :
The latest work by composer Charles Melda has yielded controversy of an entirely different manner to his offering as national anthem, Pulias, Rise Like a Phoenix. No, his latest piece, Night of the Roaming Dead has not attracted any political attention, but it has shocked the mores of modern society by bringing dissonant harmonies and primitive rhythms to the civilised world.

You may have read in this very paper that on the première performance of the work the audience were so shocked by the uncivilised sounds contained within that they engaged in civil disorder in the normally peaceful and quiet Haven of Peace. Order was restored quickly and some publicly called for the composer responsible to be arrested, but ultimately no action was taken against him because it was not possible to determine which law exactly he had broken.

When I asked Mr. Melda about the disturbance, he looked at me with a look of dark amusement on his face. I asked if he expected to receive such a reaction to his work. "I don't think anyone could have predicted what took place that night. It was utterly bizarre and almost unholy." When I asked why he looked amused he pointed out that the pervasive sense of unease, of being besieged, and unrestrained rage is what he had felt at being publicly targeted over the national anthem affair.

So this was the piece inspired by the negative attention surrounding Pulias, Rise Like a Phoenix. "Absolutely," he confirmed, with a hard look behind his eyes. "Now everyone can feel — viscerally — when listening to this music a fraction of a taste of how it feels to be at the centre of such a storm. To be blamed when you have done nothing wrong. It absolutely rankles me. And I'm glad to have allowed some people to feel it, that they might think twice about judging others so harshly in the future." I asked if he felt responsible for the disorder caused by patrons upon hearing his work. "Absolutely not. As my friend Daniel said, these people were responsible for their own actions. They had a small taste of the rage I felt. But I didn't do anything wrong; I didn't assault anyone. If I can handle being nationally humiliated and not lash out in violence then I think the good citizens of Haven of Peace should be expected to hold themselves to the same standard as civilised people, if they claim to be such."

I explained that I had trouble working out the harmonic environment of the piece, because it really is like nothing I've ever heard before produced here in Pulias or abroad. Mr. Melda nodded, understanding completely my point, as he explained: "To create the unsettling mood I tried to avoid anything comfortable or familiar, so I refrained from employing conventional key signatures and instead used tonal centres only." When asked where he had learnt that, he looked at me strangely and explained mysteriously "the music wills itself, you know."

For those readers too timid to risk unleashing their inner animalistic selves, I shall describe the piece for you. The work is for a fairly small ensemble, or at least two small ensembles: a wind quartet and a percussion ensemble. It starts slowly, with an eerie and unnatural feeling. A darkly low-pitched flute is joined by an eerily-sounding melodic line performed by the oboe, which is later joined by an ominous bassoon while concert bells and xylophones seem to ascend into the air. The clarinet sounds like the only frail connection the normal world; everything feels strange, lurid, almost supernatural.

A sharply bell-like trilling triangle leads to a suddenly brisk change of pace. The music takes off, faster and more intense. Pounding timpani and splashing cymbals crash through the air while the woodwind instruments hold the melodic and chordal elements together. Melodic lines and fragments thereof are handed back and forth between the instruments. It all builds furiously, with a driving bassoon bass line joined by a trilling clarinet which leads to an almost epically stately affair, with gloriously tinkling bells, ominous timpani and pedal-like woodwind chords. It feels almost like an unholy or ghostly procession.

After the climax of the piece is reached a sad, solo clarinet tolls, in what feels like a last gasp of breath. The slow opening section of the piece then returns, but this time everything is transposed one tone upward, making it almost, but not exactly the same in an almost imperceptible but definitely off-putting way. After the energy runs out of the piece the quiet ending melody by the clarinet seems almost to be a statement, and that statement would be "abandon all hope, ye who enter here."

So the verdict: should you listen to this work? If you are timid in nature, or have trouble repressing your emotions, or a member of the fairer sex, then no, I say you should avoid listening to this music if it is playing at your local music hall. But if you think you can bear the temptation upon hearing the music to lose civility and self-control, then you should investigate this most strange offering from Charles Melda. I have truly never heard the like of this music before in my life. And part of me wishes that it were still the case. Nonetheless, a very strong offering from this twenty-five year old composer. But he has shared a darker side of himself than I think any would have expected lurked within. Proceed with caution, dear readers.




Portrait of Charles Melda, composer (1830)
 
Melda, just out of curiosity, where do you get those musical pieces?
 
In the wake of the attention regarding Charles Melda's Pulias, Rise Like a Phoenix and the Emperor's proposal to adopt Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser as the national anthem of Pulias, my Cabinet has been investigating the national anthem question since it seems to have woken the interest of many Pulians.

We have approached Pulian musician Gustavus Holst, who has no familial or other relationship to any Senator, and he has written the following piece based on a traditional Pulian folk tune. We in the Cabinet propose this to be adopted as the national anthem of Pulias.


Link to video.

((OOC: This is as you can see the Elizabeth peace theme, the in-game music used by the Pulias civ since it is based on England. We think this is appropriate, plus it is a very nice tune.))

As for the Emperor's proposal we don't think it is suitable as an anthem for the whole nation since it is very specific to him and his family, and we instead propose its adoption as a royal anthem.

We would now like to open up for a 48 hour submission period where members of the public (you other players) can submit their own proposals for national anthem. If we receive any submissions there will be a public plebiscite like the one for national flag. If we receive no submissions, the tune by Gustavus Holst will be automatically adopted as the national anthem of Pulias.

Time left for submissions: [TIMER="2015/09/03 23:00 UTC;Expired"][/TIMER]

Submitting a proposal is done by posting a link to your proposed anthem here in the thread and stating that it is a submission.
 
Melda, just out of curiosity, where do you get those musical pieces?

The dark recesses of my mind?

Haha. :lol: I wrote them. :)
 
((OOC: This is as you can see the Elizabeth peace theme, the in-game music used by the Pulias civ since it is based on England. We think this is appropriate, plus it is a very nice tune.))

OOC: Oh no! As its national anthem, Pulias might get stuck with the Civ theme that I consider both the best and my favorite? No! :lol:
 
I was commenting to someone else the other week (Gurra, I think) that that particular theme (also used by Holst in Jupiter, the Bringer of Jollity from the The Planets suite makes me feel strangely sentimental for Mother England, a place I've never even visited. :p

Most strange.
 
The dark recesses of my mind?

Haha. :lol: I wrote them. :)

Really? I didn't know you were a composer. That was really good.

I've composed one piece of music, but that's it.
 
I wholly recommend Sibelius as good music notation software.

And Charles is young, so there's plenty more music to come. ;)
 
I was commenting to someone else the other week (Gurra, I think) that that particular theme (also used by Holst in Jupiter, the Bringer of Jollity from the The Planets suite makes me feel strangely sentimental for Mother England, a place I've never even visited. :p

Most strange.

Yeah, the same thing applies to me, though you at least have an excuse as an antipodean :p. I'm a 'Murcan (also part Irish), so it probably shouldn't inspire the same sort of emotional response it does.
Actually, yes it should. "I Vow To Thee, My Country" is, objectively, one of the best pieces of patriotic music ever composed, right alongside some of the South American national anthems, Du Gamla, Du Fria, Die Wacht am Rhein, La Marseilles when given the full treatment, and (I will show my hand) Gott Erhalte Franz den Kaiser, and the treatment they give it for Civ V makes it all the much better.
 
((What is the difference between personal funds and party funds? I was wondering because I noticed I'm the richest person in the country at the moment but the party isn't.))
 
((What is the difference between personal funds and party funds? I was wondering because I noticed I'm the richest person in the country at the moment but the party isn't.))

Theoretically, party funds represent the amount of money in the party warchest, which is a portion of each member's monetary reserves (alongside whatever comes from 'donations'). Personal funds represent your own personal wealth.

I probably shouldn't have separated party and personal funds; that was inept of me. But it's too late now.
 
Voting has closed on the Orders Act 1833 and this time around they passed. ((You Senators need to sleep more so you can stay awake in the chamber. ;)))

Ayes | Noes | Abstains
Heerlo Antilles (PAU)|none|Ernest Barnard* (PAU)
Aurora Gurra (PPP)||Percy Huggins (PPP)
William Melda (PPP)||Sofia Megame (Ind.)
David Richterson (Ind.)||

*It is unclear to me whether Senator Barnard voted Aye only on the fast-track motion or on the bill itself aswell. Hence why he is currently listed under Abstains.
 
Personal funds represent your own personal wealth.

Hmm . . . I hadn't actually thought of it like that before. I took it as being public funds made available to us as candidates to assist with our election campaigns (like the party funds, but given to our personal campaigns rather than the party machine) as opposed to our personal wealth.

Roleplaying wise that means PPP characters have heavily donated their personal wealth to the party, because after each campaign all leftover personal funds have been going into the party Treasury.

I probably shouldn't have separated party and personal funds; that was inept of me. But it's too late now.

I have no objection to the current setup. To use my party as an example, each candidate is free to spend their personal funds on whatever they feel is best however the expenditure of any party funds needs the consent (or at least the absence of an objection) from all party members. So we've found very different uses for the different pools of monies.

*It is unclear to me whether Senator Barnard voted Aye only on the fast-track motion or on the bill itself aswell. Hence why he is currently listed under Abstains.

I took that as him approving the fast-track motion only. We all know he would have voted aye, but agreeing to fast-track a bill doesn't necessarily mean you agree with it; you could be fast-tracking a bill in order to kill it quickly, for example.
 
Since no songs were submitted there will be no plebiscite on national anthem, as I Vow to Thee, My Country is the only proposal and hence is to be chosen as the national anthem of Pulias.

Gott erhalte Franz den Kaiser will be adopted as a royal anthem.
 
Top Bottom