madviking
north american scum
Neither, things evolve over time.
Wat.
Evolution is not a process; it's a mechanic. You just admitted that evolution is real unless you have a completely different definition of "evolve" from me.
Neither, things evolve over time.
Can I get a response?Am I immoral?
Can I get a response?
So, even non-sexual romantic love for someone of your own gender is a sin, now?
Even if it is absolutely and unequivocally non-sexual?"Being gay" isn't a sin because you can't control it. Feeling attraction for a member of the same-sex isn't a sin either, unless you intentionally retain that attraction, then it remains a sin.
What about being romantically or sexually involved with somebody of a different gender but the same sex?Well, yes. We are ALL immoral, we are all sinners.
That said, if this is related to you recently "Coming out" as gay, that in itself isn't necessarily a sin. Becomming romantically or sexually involved with a person of the same-gender is.
What about being romantically or sexually involved with somebody of a different gender but the same sex?
And what kind of human was Adam supposed to be anyway? Homo sapiens? Homo erectus? Australopithecus afarensis? I never got the fundamentalist evangelical answer to that (despite asking).
When God says to Abraham "I shall make your decendents as numerous as the stars in the sky", is he being metaphorical?
Wat.
Evolution is not a process; it's a mechanic. You just admitted that evolution is real unless you have a completely different definition of "evolve" from me.
Can I get a response?
Alright, well, that's absolutely vile, but it does provide a follow up question: Is it then acceptable to be romantically or sexually involved with somebody of your own gender, but of a different sex (which, in your mind, would be somebody of the opposite gender)?I don't recognize "Transgender" as a valid gender. The only way you might argue (In a way that I would accept) that this could happen is if someone can PHYSICALLY be proven to have body parts from more than one gender. But a lot of times, its supposedly emotional. And if you change the gender God gave you based on feelings, this is unnatural.
I don't recognize "Transgender" as a valid gender. The only way you might argue (In a way that I would accept) that this could happen is if someone can PHYSICALLY be proven to have body parts from more than one gender. But a lot of times, its supposedly emotional. And if you change the gender God gave you based on feelings, this is unnatural.
what's wrong with unnatural?I don't recognize "Transgender" as a valid gender. The only way you might argue (In a way that I would accept) that this could happen is if someone can PHYSICALLY be proven to have body parts from more than one gender. But a lot of times, its supposedly emotional. And if you change the gender God gave you based on feelings, this is unnatural.
Moderator Action: From now on please refrain from asking any questions about or discussing anything related to homosexuality. Any such discussion will be deleted and possibly punished more harshly. Those issues can be discussed in another thread.
Also, this thread is on a very short leash. Stay civil, and more importantly, keep the content away from spam and pointless bickering.
Nothing. That is an impossibility. Why would God all of a sudden change His mind 500 years after the fact? A wrong does not correct another wrong to make it right.
I don't think that is possiblee...
I am 100% certain of Christianity's truth.
First, you would have to plant some form of doubt in my mind of the truth of Christianity, THEN prove it wrong, THEN prove Islam true.
Won't happen.