I didn't even look at the results before I picked!
I set up a map in civ3 and pitted 10 spearment against 10 tanks in a line, with one tile corresponding to each option. The position I picked was the only tank to survive.So did you guys actually used a random method (like throwing a die) or did you go "mmmmhhhh THAT one" in which case a strong argument can be made that it was not really random?
Wow I don't get that? What has learning to do with bell curves?
I set up a map in civ3 and pitted 10 spearment against 10 tanks in a line, with one tile corresponding to each option. The position I picked was the only tank to survive.
Actually, I just went "mmmmhhhh THAT one". However I don't know why I picked it, and I didn't look at the poll before voting. That is about as random as I can be without asking the RNG for help.
where they claim that IQ is biological determined by race.
I had a nearly uniform distribution of grades for a final exam last session. Scared the **** out of me.I don't think it's assumed that grades will always have a normal distribution (bell curve), it's just that often it happens, and it's no surprise when it does.
Mmmmh not really.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normal_distribution#Occurrence
A lot of natural phenomenon are bell-curved.
Wow I don't get that? What has learning to do with bell curves?
I picked the first one because that was actully option 1 and the rest were simply lies.
Well SOME characteristics will fit that curve, like blood pressure, but...
that I completely agree with. I would hate to be in a class with 30 brilliant people and have the teacher use a bell curve to apply grades. Sometimes 30 people deserve an A.
This is even worse when it's applied to the workplace - the evil variant being "in each team there will be 10% A, 60% of B and 30% of C". No, sometimes all of the members in a team are great - or terrible.
arcadian83 said:Indeed it formed a bell-curve, which I am surprised and impressed about.
No it doesn't. Unless you want to assign values to the poll options after viewing the results, and plot your graph accordingly. Then it might be close. But that's even sillier than teachers deciding the percentage of students that deserve an A in advance.
That's exactly what I do. Why is it silly? View the results, tilt your head 90 degrees to the right, and ignore the left (top)-most column. Classic bell-curve.
X axis = number of options from the top
Y axis = number of votes
me said:But that's even sillier than teachers deciding the percentage of students that deserve an A in advance.