OOC: Toteone, we need your proposal. Otherwise, we'd follow Goobs' idea.
IC:
By taking all member-state's situation at hand, I propose that we invest a total of 13 eco. I would like to request that every nation provides 20% of their budget (eco/turn) to this project, rounded to the nearest.
Therefore, each nation should provide: -
Nation - amount to provide (total budget)
Malaysia - 2 (9)
Australia - 3 (13)
Commonwealth Union - 2 (11)
The Phillipines - 2 (7)
New Khmer Empire - 1 (5)
South Vietnam - 1 (5)
Japan - 2 (10)
Would these figures be acceptable to the SEATO nations?
----
On another note, we need to place our priorites regarding the Australian scandal. Should Resolution 14 in the IC pass and military force is brought to Australia, do we honour the IC alliance or the SEATO NAP/MPP?
In this situation, I believe we have three options.
1. Scrap the NAP/MPP
2. To pledge not to join in the military coalition, citing conflict of interests.
3. To kick Australia out of SEATO, and aid the IC
4. To drop IC and join Australia
Malaysia would like to request Australia to cancel their weapons program immediately so that SEATO would not be stuck in a conflict of interests. (OOC: or at least make in discreet!
)
As Secretary-General, we shall not make our choice until the other nations have voted or debated over the subject.
---
To South Vietnam,
A member state's votes are only counted once they are member states.