Hey all
Ive always favoured financial leaders, for quick teching, a stronger economy etc.
So ive played far too many games as liz, or Huayna Capac
For a change i picked a different civ and picked roosvelt, partially because i wanted to try an organised civ, and partially because i wanted to try the navy seals in a late war
I have checkpoints (certain dates for COL, CS, Optics etc as i play island games)
And ive found that if anything im hitting those tech points faster with roosvelt than liz!
Of course maps come into play, but i think organised is helping a lot.
I miss the phil trait...but waste a lot less hammers on wonders due to Ind trait (i had marble, and oracle was 10 turns to build on marathon..i had to delay it so i could tech writing!)
So, for the economy, which trait do you prefer? FIN or Org??
Cheers
Ive always favoured financial leaders, for quick teching, a stronger economy etc.
So ive played far too many games as liz, or Huayna Capac
For a change i picked a different civ and picked roosvelt, partially because i wanted to try an organised civ, and partially because i wanted to try the navy seals in a late war
I have checkpoints (certain dates for COL, CS, Optics etc as i play island games)
And ive found that if anything im hitting those tech points faster with roosvelt than liz!
Of course maps come into play, but i think organised is helping a lot.
I miss the phil trait...but waste a lot less hammers on wonders due to Ind trait (i had marble, and oracle was 10 turns to build on marathon..i had to delay it so i could tech writing!)
So, for the economy, which trait do you prefer? FIN or Org??
Cheers